Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Principal Eigenvalue and Landscape Function of the Anderson Model on a Large Box

Daniel Sánchez-Mendoza

TL;DR

The paper studies the discrete Anderson model on large boxes and introduces the principal eigenvalue $\lambda_{n,V}$ and the landscape function $L_{n,V}$ to understand low-lying eigenmodes. It formulates and sharpens a conjecture that the product $\lambda_{n,V}\|L_{n,V}\|_\infty$ converges almost surely to the constant $\frac{\mu_d}{2d}$ as the box size grows, with explicit scaling laws for $\lambda_{n,V}$ in two regimes (C1) and (C2) dictated by the potential distribution near zero. The main contributions include a rigorous upper bound for $\lambda_{n,V}$ via the largest low-potential ball and a matching lower bound via Lifshitz tails and IDS arguments, yielding a $\liminf$ result in general and a complete $\limsup$ in one dimension. The landscape-function analysis provides a robust framework with domain monotonicity and resolvent-identity tools, establishing that $\lambda_{n,V}\|L_{n,V}\|_\infty$ is universally bounded and converges to $\frac{\mu_d}{2d}$ in the general setting, with a complete 1D proof of the limsup. The work highlights a discrete-to-continuous constant transition (from $1+\frac{d}{4}$ to $\frac{\mu_d}{2d}$) and reinforces the landscape function as a predictor for extreme localization phenomena in random media.

Abstract

We state a precise formulation of a conjecture concerning the product of the principal eigenvalue and the sup-norm of the landscape function of the Anderson model restricted to a large box. We first provide the asymptotic of the principal eigenvalue as the size of the box grows and then use it to give a partial proof of the conjecture. We give a complete proof for the one dimensional case.

Principal Eigenvalue and Landscape Function of the Anderson Model on a Large Box

TL;DR

The paper studies the discrete Anderson model on large boxes and introduces the principal eigenvalue and the landscape function to understand low-lying eigenmodes. It formulates and sharpens a conjecture that the product converges almost surely to the constant as the box size grows, with explicit scaling laws for in two regimes (C1) and (C2) dictated by the potential distribution near zero. The main contributions include a rigorous upper bound for via the largest low-potential ball and a matching lower bound via Lifshitz tails and IDS arguments, yielding a result in general and a complete in one dimension. The landscape-function analysis provides a robust framework with domain monotonicity and resolvent-identity tools, establishing that is universally bounded and converges to in the general setting, with a complete 1D proof of the limsup. The work highlights a discrete-to-continuous constant transition (from to ) and reinforces the landscape function as a predictor for extreme localization phenomena in random media.

Abstract

We state a precise formulation of a conjecture concerning the product of the principal eigenvalue and the sup-norm of the landscape function of the Anderson model restricted to a large box. We first provide the asymptotic of the principal eigenvalue as the size of the box grows and then use it to give a partial proof of the conjecture. We give a complete proof for the one dimensional case.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 12 theorems, 77 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 8 sections, 12 theorems, 77 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Empirical distribution of $\lambda_{n,V}\left(\frac{\omega_1\left| \ln F(0)\right|}{\ln n}\right)^{-2}-\mu_1$ for $d=1$ and $V(0)\overset{\text{d}}{=}$ Bernoulli$(0.3)$ computed form $10^5$ samples. The empirical mean ($m$) and empirical standard deviation ($s$) are shown in red and blue respectively.
  • Figure 2: Empirical distribution of $\lambda_{n,V}\left\| L_{n,V}\right\|_\infty-\frac{\mu_1}{2}$ for $d=1$ and $V(0)\overset{\text{d}}{=}$ Bernoulli$(0.3)$ computed form $10^5$ samples. The empirical mean ($m$) and empirical standard deviation ($s$) are shown in red and blue respectively.

Theorems & Definitions (24)

  • Conjecture 0
  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Remark
  • Proposition 3
  • proof : Proof of Proposition \ref{['PrY']}
  • Proposition 4
  • proof
  • Theorem 5: Theorem 1.3 of Biskup
  • Remark
  • ...and 14 more