Transfer in Reinforcement Learning via Regret Bounds for Learning Agents
Adrienne Tuynman, Ronald Ortner
TL;DR
This work tackles the problem of quantifying the usefulness of transfer in reinforcement learning by introducing mutual regret for a multi-agent MARL setting where agents share observations in a common environment. It adapts the UCRL2 framework into Multi-agent-UCRL, deriving a high-probability bound on the mutual regret that scales with $\sqrt{SA\aleph T\log(8A\aleph T/\delta)}$ and includes a $\sqrt{\aleph}$ term, implying per-agent gains of $\tilde{O}(DS\sqrt{AT}/\sqrt{\aleph})$ under certain conditions. The key contributions are (i) the first regret-based theoretical guarantees for simultaneous multi-agent RL with transfer, (ii) a concrete bound showing that sharing observations reduces joint regret by a factor related to the number of agents, and (iii) empirical validation on RiverSwim and SixArms confirming the practical benefit of mutual transfer. These results provide a principled, quantitative measure of transfer utility and suggest that observation sharing can substantially improve learning efficiency in multi-task RL scenarios.
Abstract
We present an approach for the quantification of the usefulness of transfer in reinforcement learning via regret bounds for a multi-agent setting. Considering a number of $\aleph$ agents operating in the same Markov decision process, however possibly with different reward functions, we consider the regret each agent suffers with respect to an optimal policy maximizing her average reward. We show that when the agents share their observations the total regret of all agents is smaller by a factor of $\sqrt{\aleph}$ compared to the case when each agent has to rely on the information collected by herself. This result demonstrates how considering the regret in multi-agent settings can provide theoretical bounds on the benefit of sharing observations in transfer learning.
