Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Gauge Enhanced Quantum Criticality Between Grand Unifications: Categorical Higher Symmetry Retraction

Juven Wang, Yi-Zhuang You

TL;DR

This work reframes gauge unification as a quantum-critical problem in a landscape of neighbor GUT vacua, where the SM sits near a gapless region between models like Georgi-Glashow SU(5) and Pati-Salam; it extends this landscape by incorporating Barr's flipped SU(5) and a refined ${\rm U}(5)_{\hat{q}}$ structure that embeds into ${\rm Spin}(10)$. Central to the construction is a modified ${\rm so}(10)$ GUT with a 4d WZW term that matches the mod 2 anomaly $w_2 w_3$, enabling SM-like critical behavior at the boundary between vacua and allowing deconfined quantum criticality in 3+1d regimes. The paper reveals first-order Landau-Ginzburg transitions between GG and flipped vacua, and beyond-Landau-Ginzburg deconfined criticalities near the quantum critical region, while exploring generalized higher symmetries and a potential non-invertible (categorical) symmetry from a ${\mathbb Z}_2^{\rm flip}$ operation that is ultimately retracted upon embedding into Spin(10). Overall, the results propose a coherent framework in which SM phenomenology emerges from a symmetry- and anomaly-protected phase diagram, with implications for generation counting, mass mechanisms, and the role of topological terms in high-energy unification.

Abstract

Prior work [arXiv:2106.16248] shows that the Standard Model (SM) naturally arises near a gapless quantum critical region between Georgi-Glashow (GG) $su(5)$ and Pati-Salam (PS) $su(4) \times su(2) \times su(2)$ models of quantum vacua (in a phase diagram or moduli space), by implementing a modified $so(10)$ Grand Unification (GUT) with a Spin(10) gauge group plus a new discrete Wess-Zumino Witten term matching a 4d nonperturbative global mixed gauge-gravity $w_2 w_3$ anomaly. In this work, we include Barr's flipped $su(5)$ model into the quantum landscape, showing these four GUT-like models arise near the quantum criticality near SM. Highlights include: First, we find the precise GG or flipped $u(5)$ gauge group requires to redefine a Lie group U(5)$_{\hat q}$ with $\hat q=2$ or $3$ (instead of non-isomorphic analog $\hat q=1$ or 4), and different $\hat q$ are related by multiple covering. Second, we show that the GG and flipped $u(5)$ are two different symmetry-breaking vacua of the same order parameter separated by a first-order Landau-Ginzburg transition. We also show that analogous 3+1d deconfined quantum criticalities, both between GG and PS, and between the flipped $u(5)$ and PS, are beyond Landau-Ginzburg paradigm. Third, topological quantum criticality occurs by tuning between the 15n vs 16n scenarios. Fourth, we explore the generalized higher global symmetries in the SM and GUTs. Gauging the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ flip symmetry between GG and flipped $u(5)$ models, leads to a potential categorical higher symmetry that is a non-invertible global symmetry: within a gauge sector $(u(1) \times u(1)) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2$, the fusion rule of 2d topological surface operator splits. However, the un-Higgs Spin(10) at UV retracts this categorical symmetry.

Gauge Enhanced Quantum Criticality Between Grand Unifications: Categorical Higher Symmetry Retraction

TL;DR

This work reframes gauge unification as a quantum-critical problem in a landscape of neighbor GUT vacua, where the SM sits near a gapless region between models like Georgi-Glashow SU(5) and Pati-Salam; it extends this landscape by incorporating Barr's flipped SU(5) and a refined structure that embeds into . Central to the construction is a modified GUT with a 4d WZW term that matches the mod 2 anomaly , enabling SM-like critical behavior at the boundary between vacua and allowing deconfined quantum criticality in 3+1d regimes. The paper reveals first-order Landau-Ginzburg transitions between GG and flipped vacua, and beyond-Landau-Ginzburg deconfined criticalities near the quantum critical region, while exploring generalized higher symmetries and a potential non-invertible (categorical) symmetry from a operation that is ultimately retracted upon embedding into Spin(10). Overall, the results propose a coherent framework in which SM phenomenology emerges from a symmetry- and anomaly-protected phase diagram, with implications for generation counting, mass mechanisms, and the role of topological terms in high-energy unification.

Abstract

Prior work [arXiv:2106.16248] shows that the Standard Model (SM) naturally arises near a gapless quantum critical region between Georgi-Glashow (GG) and Pati-Salam (PS) models of quantum vacua (in a phase diagram or moduli space), by implementing a modified Grand Unification (GUT) with a Spin(10) gauge group plus a new discrete Wess-Zumino Witten term matching a 4d nonperturbative global mixed gauge-gravity anomaly. In this work, we include Barr's flipped model into the quantum landscape, showing these four GUT-like models arise near the quantum criticality near SM. Highlights include: First, we find the precise GG or flipped gauge group requires to redefine a Lie group U(5) with or (instead of non-isomorphic analog or 4), and different are related by multiple covering. Second, we show that the GG and flipped are two different symmetry-breaking vacua of the same order parameter separated by a first-order Landau-Ginzburg transition. We also show that analogous 3+1d deconfined quantum criticalities, both between GG and PS, and between the flipped and PS, are beyond Landau-Ginzburg paradigm. Third, topological quantum criticality occurs by tuning between the 15n vs 16n scenarios. Fourth, we explore the generalized higher global symmetries in the SM and GUTs. Gauging the flip symmetry between GG and flipped models, leads to a potential categorical higher symmetry that is a non-invertible global symmetry: within a gauge sector , the fusion rule of 2d topological surface operator splits. However, the un-Higgs Spin(10) at UV retracts this categorical symmetry.
Paper Structure (43 sections, 56 equations, 12 figures, 7 tables)

This paper contains 43 sections, 56 equations, 12 figures, 7 tables.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: (a) "Unity of Gauge Forces" perspective seeks for a single unified dynamically gauged internal symmetry at high energy, which is a more kinematic or static issue of gauge theories towards higher energy. (b) Our "quantum competing criticality" perspective Wang2106.16248YouWang2202.13498 suggests that the SM is a low energy quantum vacuum arising from the quantum competition of various neighbor GUT-like vacua (which can also appear at higher energy). Especially when there are constraints from topological terms or nonperturbative global anomalies, the SM arises near a gapless quantum critical region (schematically shown as the shaded gray area). The gapless quantum critical region induces new beyond-SM gapless modes, Dark Gauge forces, or excitations. This perspective is more on the dynamics, criticality, or phase transition issue of gauge theories.
  • Figure 2: Standard Model with 16n Weyl fermions and their ${{su(3)}_c \times {su(2)}_{\rm L} \times u(1)_{\tilde{Y}}}$ representation (rep): $\bar{d}_R \oplus {l}_L \oplus q_L \oplus \bar{u}_R \oplus \bar{e}_R \oplus \bar{\nu}_R = (\overline{\bf 3},{\bf 1})_{2,L} \oplus ({\bf 1},{\bf 2})_{-3,L} \oplus ({\bf 3},{\bf 2})_{1,L} \oplus (\overline{\bf 3},{\bf 1})_{-4,L} \oplus ({\bf 1},{\bf 1})_{6,L} \oplus {({\bf 1},{\bf 1})_{0,L}}$.
  • Figure 3: Georgi-Glashow $u(5)$ GUT with 16n Weyl fermions and their $u(5)^{\rm 1st} = su(5)^{\rm 1st} \times u(1)_{X} = su(5)^{\rm 1st} \times u(1)_{X_1}$ rep: $(\bar{d}_R \oplus {l}_L ) \oplus (q_L \oplus \bar{u}_R \oplus \bar{e}_R) \oplus ( \bar{\nu}_R) = \overline{\bf 5}_{-3} \oplus {\bf 10}_{1} \oplus {\bf 1}_{5}$.
  • Figure 4: Flipped $u(5)$ GUT with 16n Weyl fermions and their $u(5)^{\rm 2nd} = su(5)^{\rm 2nd} \times u(1)_{\chi} = su(5)^{\rm 1st} \times u(1)_{X_2}$ rep: $(\bar{u}_R \oplus {l}_L ) \oplus (q_L \oplus \bar{d}_R \oplus \bar{\nu}_R) \oplus ( \bar{e}_R) = \overline{\bf 5}_{-3} \oplus {\bf 10}_{1} \oplus {\bf 1}_{5}$. Note that the charge of $X_1 = X \neq \chi = X_2$.
  • Figure 5: Pati-Salam $su(4) \times su(2)_{\rm L} \times su(2)_{\rm R}$ model and their rep: $(q_L \oplus l_L) \oplus (q_R \oplus l_R) = (u_L \oplus d_L \oplus \nu_L \oplus e_L) \oplus (\bar{u}_R \oplus \bar{d}_R \oplus \bar{\nu}_R \oplus \bar{e}_R) = ({\bf 4}, {\bf 2}, {\bf 1}) \oplus (\overline{\bf 4}, {\bf 1}, {\bf 2})$.
  • ...and 7 more figures