Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Functional model for generalised resolvents and its application to time-dispersive media

Kirill D. Cherednichenko, Yulia Yu. Ershova, Sergey N. Naboko

Abstract

Motivated by recent results concerning the asymptotic behaviour of differential operators with highly contrasting coefficients, which have involved effective descriptions involving generalised resolvents, we construct the functional model for a typical example of the latter. This provides a spectral representation for the generalised resolvent, which can be utilised for further analysis, in particular the construction of the scattering operator in related wave propagation setups.

Functional model for generalised resolvents and its application to time-dispersive media

Abstract

Motivated by recent results concerning the asymptotic behaviour of differential operators with highly contrasting coefficients, which have involved effective descriptions involving generalised resolvents, we construct the functional model for a typical example of the latter. This provides a spectral representation for the generalised resolvent, which can be utilised for further analysis, in particular the construction of the scattering operator in related wave propagation setups.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 6 theorems, 93 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Denote $H:=\oplus_{j=1}^3 L^2(0, l_j).$ There exists $C>0,$ independent of $\varepsilon$ and $\tau,$ such that where $\Psi$ is a partial isometry from $H$ to $L^2(0,l_2)\oplus\mathbb C.$

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Example of a periodic graph with contrast.The infinite graph $\mathbb G_\infty$ and the "period" $\mathbb G_\varepsilon$ are outlined on the left; the graph unit cell $\mathbb G$ obtained after applying the Gelfand transform is shown on the right. The soft component is drawn in blue.

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Theorem 2.1: GrandePreuve
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 4.1
  • Remark 1
  • Theorem 4.2