Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Porosities of the sets of attractors

Paweł Klinga, Adam Kwela

TL;DR

The paper investigates two attractor families, $A[0,1]^d$ and $A_w[0,1]^d$, as subsets of the hyperspace $K([0,1]^d)$. It develops the hyperspace and porosity framework, showing that $A[0,1]^d$ is not $\sigma$-strongly porous in $K([0,1]^d)$ while the difference $A_w[0,1]^d\setminus A[0,1]^d$ is dense in $K([0,1]^d)$. A dimension-raising transfer is used to connect attractors across dimensions. The core contribution is a coding-based argument for the non-$\sigma$-strong-porosity of classical attractors, complemented by a density result for weak-attractor deviations, clarifying structural distinctions between IFS and wIFS attractor spaces. These results advance the understanding of the geometric and descriptive-set-theoretic structure of attractor families in hyperspaces of compact sets.

Abstract

This paper is another attempt to measure the difference between the family $A[0,1]$ of attractors for iterated function systems acting on $[0,1]$ and a broader family, the set $A_w[0,1]$ of attractors for weak iterated function systems acting on $[0,1]$. It is known that both $A[0,1]$ and $A_w[0,1]$ are meager subsets of the hyperspace $K([0,1])$ (of all compact subsets of $[0,1]$ equipped in the Hausdorff metric). Actually, $A[0,1]$ is even $σ$-lower porous while the question about $σ$-lower porosity of $A_w[0,1]$ is still open. We prove that $A[0,1]$ is not $σ$-strongly porous in $K([0,1])$. Moreover, we show that $A_w[0,1]\setminus A[0,1]$ is dense in $K([0,1])$.

Porosities of the sets of attractors

TL;DR

The paper investigates two attractor families, and , as subsets of the hyperspace . It develops the hyperspace and porosity framework, showing that is not -strongly porous in while the difference is dense in . A dimension-raising transfer is used to connect attractors across dimensions. The core contribution is a coding-based argument for the non--strong-porosity of classical attractors, complemented by a density result for weak-attractor deviations, clarifying structural distinctions between IFS and wIFS attractor spaces. These results advance the understanding of the geometric and descriptive-set-theoretic structure of attractor families in hyperspaces of compact sets.

Abstract

This paper is another attempt to measure the difference between the family of attractors for iterated function systems acting on and a broader family, the set of attractors for weak iterated function systems acting on . It is known that both and are meager subsets of the hyperspace (of all compact subsets of equipped in the Hausdorff metric). Actually, is even -lower porous while the question about -lower porosity of is still open. We prove that is not -strongly porous in . Moreover, we show that is dense in .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 4 theorems, 19 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 3.1

For each $d\in\mathbb{N}$ the following hold:

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Lemma 3.1: D
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.1
  • proof