Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Comparison of Exterior Power Operations on Higher K-Theory of Schemes

Bernhard Köck, Ferdinando Zanchetta

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of reconciling exterior power operations on higher $K$-theory across multiple constructions by extending exterior powers to complexes, comparing combinatorial and homotopical definitions, and unifying with Barwick–Glasman–Mathew–Nikolaus via Zan21. It develops a robust framework that carries the operations to $K$-theory spaces via Grayson’s $G$-construction and demonstrates compatibility through a sequence of isomorphisms, culminating in a main theorem that equates distinct constructions. A central achievement is proving the GRR conjecture for composition of exterior powers in higher equivariant $K$-theory, thereby confirming that higher equivariant $K$-theory forms a lambda-ring. The results solidify Grothendieck’s Riemann–Roch program in the higher and equivariant setting and provide a unified foundation across classical and modern approaches to exterior power operations.

Abstract

Exterior power operations provide an additional structure on K-groups of schemes which lies at the heart of Grothendieck's Riemann-Roch theory. Over the past decades, various authors have constructed such operations on higher K-theory. In this paper, we prove that these constructions actually yield the same operations, ultimately matching up the explicit combinatorial description by Harris, the first author and Taelman on the one hand and the recent, conceptually clear-cut construction by Barwick, Glasman, Mathew and Nikolaus on the other hand. This also leads to the proof of a conjecture by the first author about composition of these operations in the equivariant context, completing the proof that higher equivariant K-groups satisfy all axioms of a lambda-ring.

Comparison of Exterior Power Operations on Higher K-Theory of Schemes

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of reconciling exterior power operations on higher -theory across multiple constructions by extending exterior powers to complexes, comparing combinatorial and homotopical definitions, and unifying with Barwick–Glasman–Mathew–Nikolaus via Zan21. It develops a robust framework that carries the operations to -theory spaces via Grayson’s -construction and demonstrates compatibility through a sequence of isomorphisms, culminating in a main theorem that equates distinct constructions. A central achievement is proving the GRR conjecture for composition of exterior powers in higher equivariant -theory, thereby confirming that higher equivariant -theory forms a lambda-ring. The results solidify Grothendieck’s Riemann–Roch program in the higher and equivariant setting and provide a unified foundation across classical and modern approaches to exterior power operations.

Abstract

Exterior power operations provide an additional structure on K-groups of schemes which lies at the heart of Grothendieck's Riemann-Roch theory. Over the past decades, various authors have constructed such operations on higher K-theory. In this paper, we prove that these constructions actually yield the same operations, ultimately matching up the explicit combinatorial description by Harris, the first author and Taelman on the one hand and the recent, conceptually clear-cut construction by Barwick, Glasman, Mathew and Nikolaus on the other hand. This also leads to the proof of a conjecture by the first author about composition of these operations in the equivariant context, completing the proof that higher equivariant K-groups satisfy all axioms of a lambda-ring.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 24 theorems, 71 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.2

The sequence of exact categories $C^\infty {\mathcal{M}}_n$, $n \ge 0$, together with the functors defined above is again an assembly of power operations. By restricting to the subcategories $C{\mathcal{M}}_n$, $n \ge 0$, we obtain another assembly of power operations.

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Proposition 1.2
  • proof
  • Definition 1.3
  • Proposition 1.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 1.5
  • proof
  • Corollary 1.6
  • proof
  • ...and 46 more