Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Essential dimension via prismatic cohomology

Benson Farb, Mark Kisin, Jesse Wolfson

Abstract

For $X$ a smooth, proper complex variety we show that for $p\gg 0$, the restriction of the mod $p$ cohomology $H^i(X,\mathbb{F}_p)$ to any Zariski open has dimension at least $h^{0,i}_X$. The proof uses the prismatic cohomology of Bhatt-Scholze. We use this result to obtain lower bounds on the $p$-essential dimension of covers of complex varieties. For example, we prove the $p$-incompressibility of the mod $p$ homology cover of an abelian variety, confirming a conjecture of Brosnan for sufficiently large $p.$ By combining these techniques with the theory of toroidal compactifications of Shimura varieties, we show that for any Hermitian symmetric domain $X,$ there exist $p$-congruence covers that are $p$-incompressible.

Essential dimension via prismatic cohomology

Abstract

For a smooth, proper complex variety we show that for , the restriction of the mod cohomology to any Zariski open has dimension at least . The proof uses the prismatic cohomology of Bhatt-Scholze. We use this result to obtain lower bounds on the -essential dimension of covers of complex varieties. For example, we prove the -incompressibility of the mod homology cover of an abelian variety, confirming a conjecture of Brosnan for sufficiently large By combining these techniques with the theory of toroidal compactifications of Shimura varieties, we show that for any Hermitian symmetric domain there exist -congruence covers that are -incompressible.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 42 theorems, 83 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $X$ be a smooth proper complex variety of maximal Albanese dimension, and $Y \rightarrow X$ its mod $p$ homology cover. Then for $p \gg 0,$$Y\rightarrow X$ is p-incompressible, i.e.

Theorems & Definitions (80)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Lemma 2.1.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.1.6
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.1.8
  • proof
  • ...and 70 more