Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Steenrod Lengths and a Problem of Vakil

Khanh Nguyen Duc

TL;DR

This work delivers an explicit combinatorial solution to computing the Steenrod length function $f(n)$ for real projective spaces by reframing the problem on binary classes and Vakil numbers within the directed graphs $T_n$. The authors prove concrete formulas: for Vakil numbers $f(n)=k+\frac{a(a+1)}{2}$, for numbers in a $k$-dimensional binary class $f(n)=S(\overline{n})+\Delta_k$, and in general $f(n)=S(\overline{n})+\Delta^{\widehat{n}}$ where $\widehat{n}$ is the closest Vakil number to $\overline{n}$ with $4|k$, with an efficient reduction algorithm via canonical paths. They also provide a complete proof of these statements (including detailed lemmas and a constructive reduction procedure) and illustrate the method with explicit examples, thereby resolving Vakil’s open question on an explicit combinatorial description of $f(n)$. The results connect homotopy-theoretic invariants to precise combinatorial data, enabling practical computation and offering new insights into the interaction between Steenrod operations, binary expansions, and graph-theoretic encodings of degree constraints.

Abstract

We give an explicit combinatorial description of the function $f(n)$ governing the Steenrod length of real projective spaces $\mathbb{RP}^n$. This function arises in stable homotopy theory through the action of Steenrod squares on mod-$2$ cohomology and is closely related to the ghost length, which measures the minimal number of spheres required to construct a space up to homotopy. Building on the directed graphs $T_n$ introduced by Vakil to encode degree constraints for Steenrod operations, we interpret $f(n)$ as the length of the longest directed path starting at $n$. Using this framework, we resolve a question posed by Vakil by deriving concrete combinatorial formulas for $f(n)$ in terms of binary classes and a distinguished family of integers, which we call Vakil numbers.

Steenrod Lengths and a Problem of Vakil

TL;DR

This work delivers an explicit combinatorial solution to computing the Steenrod length function for real projective spaces by reframing the problem on binary classes and Vakil numbers within the directed graphs . The authors prove concrete formulas: for Vakil numbers , for numbers in a -dimensional binary class , and in general where is the closest Vakil number to with , with an efficient reduction algorithm via canonical paths. They also provide a complete proof of these statements (including detailed lemmas and a constructive reduction procedure) and illustrate the method with explicit examples, thereby resolving Vakil’s open question on an explicit combinatorial description of . The results connect homotopy-theoretic invariants to precise combinatorial data, enabling practical computation and offering new insights into the interaction between Steenrod operations, binary expansions, and graph-theoretic encodings of degree constraints.

Abstract

We give an explicit combinatorial description of the function governing the Steenrod length of real projective spaces . This function arises in stable homotopy theory through the action of Steenrod squares on mod- cohomology and is closely related to the ghost length, which measures the minimal number of spheres required to construct a space up to homotopy. Building on the directed graphs introduced by Vakil to encode degree constraints for Steenrod operations, we interpret as the length of the longest directed path starting at . Using this framework, we resolve a question posed by Vakil by deriving concrete combinatorial formulas for in terms of binary classes and a distinguished family of integers, which we call Vakil numbers.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 21 theorems, 44 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1.2

Let $n$ be a Vakil number with Vakil pair $(a,k)$. Then $f(n)=k+\frac{a(a+1)}{2}$.

Theorems & Definitions (55)

  • Example 1.1
  • Lemma 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Lemma 2.1: vakil1999steenrod
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: vakil1999steenrod
  • Definition 2.2
  • Remark 2.3: vakil1999steenrod
  • ...and 45 more