Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Clones from comonoids

Ulrich Krähmer, Myriam Mahaman

Abstract

The fact that the cocommutative comonoids in a symmetric monoidal category form the best possible approximation by a cartesian category is revisited when the original category is only braided monoidal. This leads to the question when the endomorphism operad of a comonoid is a clone (a Lawvere theory). By giving an explicit example, we prove that this does not imply that the comonoid is cocommutative.

Clones from comonoids

Abstract

The fact that the cocommutative comonoids in a symmetric monoidal category form the best possible approximation by a cartesian category is revisited when the original category is only braided monoidal. This leads to the question when the endomorphism operad of a comonoid is a clone (a Lawvere theory). By giving an explicit example, we prove that this does not imply that the comonoid is cocommutative.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 34 theorems, 76 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\mathbf{C}$ be a braided monoidal category, $\operatorname{Com}(\mathbf{C})$ be the category of comonoids in $\mathbf{C}$, and $(X, \Delta _X, \varepsilon _X)$ be a comonoid. Then the monoidal subcategory of $\operatorname{Com} (\mathbf{C})$ formed by the tensor powers $X^{\otimes n}$ is cartes

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Selections
  • Figure 2: $- \cdot f: \mathbf{M}(A_1,A_1,A_2; B) \to \mathbf{M}(A_1,A_2;B)$
  • Figure 3: From a cartesian operad into a clone
  • Figure 4: Conditions for cocommutativity

Theorems & Definitions (84)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Lemma 2.7
  • ...and 74 more