Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Asymmetric attractive zero-range processes with particle destruction at the origin

Marielle Simon, Linjie Zhao, Clément Erignoux

TL;DR

The paper analyzes an asymmetric attractive zero-range process on ${\mathbb Z}$ with particle destruction at the origin at rate ${\alpha N^{\beta}}$, deriving its hydrodynamic limit across three regimes of ${\beta}$. Using entropy-methods, couplings, and second-class particles, it proves convergence to the entropy solution of a hyperbolic conservation law with boundary conditions that depend on ${\beta}$: no boundary condition for ${\beta<0}$, a Robin-type current constraint for ${\beta=0}$, and a Dirichlet-type mass-removal regime for ${\beta>0}$. The authors also provide a transparent linear-case analysis with an explicit macroscopic formula and a duality-based proof. The results clarify how microscopic destruction strength at the origin shapes macroscopic flux, mass balance, and shock behavior in hyperbolic limits, and extend prior open-system hydrodynamics for ZRPs by incorporating interior boundary destruction dynamics.

Abstract

We investigate the macroscopic behavior of asymmetric attractive zero-range processes on $\mathbb{Z}$ where particles are destroyed at the origin at a rate of order $N^β$, where $β\in \mathbb{R}$ and $N\in\mathbb{N}$ is the scaling parameter. We prove that the hydrodynamic limit of this particle system is described by the unique entropy solution of a hyperbolic conservation law, supplemented by a boundary condition depending on the range of $β$. Namely, if $β\geqslant 0$, then the boundary condition prescribes the particle current through the origin, whereas if $β<0$, the destruction of particles at the origin has no macroscopic effect on the system and no boundary condition is imposed at the hydrodynamic limit.

Asymmetric attractive zero-range processes with particle destruction at the origin

TL;DR

The paper analyzes an asymmetric attractive zero-range process on with particle destruction at the origin at rate , deriving its hydrodynamic limit across three regimes of . Using entropy-methods, couplings, and second-class particles, it proves convergence to the entropy solution of a hyperbolic conservation law with boundary conditions that depend on : no boundary condition for , a Robin-type current constraint for , and a Dirichlet-type mass-removal regime for . The authors also provide a transparent linear-case analysis with an explicit macroscopic formula and a duality-based proof. The results clarify how microscopic destruction strength at the origin shapes macroscopic flux, mass balance, and shock behavior in hyperbolic limits, and extend prior open-system hydrodynamics for ZRPs by incorporating interior boundary destruction dynamics.

Abstract

We investigate the macroscopic behavior of asymmetric attractive zero-range processes on where particles are destroyed at the origin at a rate of order , where and is the scaling parameter. We prove that the hydrodynamic limit of this particle system is described by the unique entropy solution of a hyperbolic conservation law, supplemented by a boundary condition depending on the range of . Namely, if , then the boundary condition prescribes the particle current through the origin, whereas if , the destruction of particles at the origin has no macroscopic effect on the system and no boundary condition is imposed at the hydrodynamic limit.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 14 theorems, 148 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.4

For any compactly supported and continuous function $H:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$, for any $t \geqslant 0$ and for any $\delta > 0$, where

Theorems & Definitions (37)

  • Definition 2.1: Hydrodynamic equation on $\mathbb{R}$ for $\beta < 0$
  • Remark 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.2: Hydrodynamic equation on $\mathbb{R}^+$ for $\beta = 0$
  • Definition 2.3: Hydrodynamic equation on $\mathbb{R}^+$ for $\beta > 0$
  • Remark 2.3: Uniqueness of the entropy solution
  • Theorem 2.4: Hydrodynamic limit
  • Remark 2.5
  • Remark 2.6: Linear case
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 27 more