Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Muonic Boson Limits: Supernova Redux

Andrea Caputo, Georg Raffelt, Edoardo Vitagliano

Abstract

We derive supernova (SN) bounds on muon-philic bosons, taking advantage of the recent emergence of muonic SN models. Our main innovations are to consider scalars $φ$ in addition to pseudoscalars $a$ and to include systematically the generic two-photon coupling $G_{γγ}$ implied by a muon triangle loop. This interaction allows for Primakoff scattering and radiative boson decays. The globular-cluster bound $G_{γγ}<0.67\times10^{-10}~{\rm GeV}^{-1}$ derived for axion-like particles carries over to the muonic Yukawa couplings as $g_a<3.1\times10^{-9}$ and $g_φ< 4.6\times10^{-9}$ for $m_{a,φ}\lesssim 100$ keV, so SN arguments become interesting mainly for larger masses. If bosons escape freely from the SN core the main constraints originate from SN1987A $γ$ rays and the diffuse cosmic $γ$-ray background. The latter allows at most $10^{-4}$ of a typical total SN energy of $E_{\rm SN}\simeq3\times10^{53}$erg to show up as $γ$ rays, for $m_{a,φ}\gtrsim 100$keV implying $g_a \lesssim 0.9\times10^{-10}$ and $g_φ\lesssim 0.4\times10^{-10}$. In the trapping regime the bosons emerge as quasi-thermal radiation from a region near the neutrino sphere and match $L_ν$ for $g_{a,φ}\simeq 10^{-4}$. However, the $2γ$ decay is so fast that all the energy is dumped into the surrounding progenitor-star matter, whereas at most $10^{-2}E_{\rm SN}$ may show up in the explosion. To suppress boson emission below this level we need yet larger couplings, $g_{a}\gtrsim 2\times10^{-3}$ and $g_φ\gtrsim 4\times10^{-3}$. Muonic scalars can explain the muon magnetic-moment anomaly for $g_φ\simeq 0.4\times10^{-3}$, a value hard to reconcile with SN physics despite the uncertainty of the explosion-energy bound. For generic axion-like particles, this argument covers the "cosmological triangle" in the $G_{aγγ}$--$m_a$ parameter space.

Muonic Boson Limits: Supernova Redux

Abstract

We derive supernova (SN) bounds on muon-philic bosons, taking advantage of the recent emergence of muonic SN models. Our main innovations are to consider scalars in addition to pseudoscalars and to include systematically the generic two-photon coupling implied by a muon triangle loop. This interaction allows for Primakoff scattering and radiative boson decays. The globular-cluster bound derived for axion-like particles carries over to the muonic Yukawa couplings as and for keV, so SN arguments become interesting mainly for larger masses. If bosons escape freely from the SN core the main constraints originate from SN1987A rays and the diffuse cosmic -ray background. The latter allows at most of a typical total SN energy of erg to show up as rays, for keV implying and . In the trapping regime the bosons emerge as quasi-thermal radiation from a region near the neutrino sphere and match for . However, the decay is so fast that all the energy is dumped into the surrounding progenitor-star matter, whereas at most may show up in the explosion. To suppress boson emission below this level we need yet larger couplings, and . Muonic scalars can explain the muon magnetic-moment anomaly for , a value hard to reconcile with SN physics despite the uncertainty of the explosion-energy bound. For generic axion-like particles, this argument covers the "cosmological triangle" in the -- parameter space.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 46 sections, 88 equations, 12 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Profile of the Garching muonic SN model SFHo-18.8 at $t_{\rm pb}=1$ s Bollig:2020xdr that we will use as our "cold reference model." Top: Chemical potentials, temperature, plasma frequency $\omega_{\rm p}$, and Debye screening scale $k_{\rm s}$. Bottom: Number densities $n_i$, normalized to $n_0 = 0.181~{\rm fm}^{-3}$, corresponding to nuclear density of $3\times10^{14}~{\rm g}~{\rm cm}^{-3}$.
  • Figure 2: Constraints on the muonic Yukawa coupling $g_a$ of pseudoscalars (left panel) and $g_\phi$ of scalars (right panel) as a function of boson mass. We also show the constraint where the muon $g_\mu{-}2$ discrepancy would get worse (pseudoscalars) or could be explained (scalars). The shading or double arrows indicate the excluded range, except for the scalar range ruled in by $g_\mu{-}2$. The SN bounds are derived in this paper and summarized in Table \ref{['tab:allconstraints']} using both a hot and a cold SN reference model. We here show conservative limits (the larger number in the free-streaming case and the smaller one in the trapping regime). The HB-star bounds are taken from Ref. Carenza:2020zil, the cosmological $N_{\rm eff}$ constraint from Ref. Depta:2020zbh.
  • Figure 3: Cross section for the muonic Compton process with a final-state vector (solid), scalar (dashed) or pseudoscalar (dotted). The vector case requires a factor of 2 for the final-state polarizations. The energy $\omega$ is considered in the muon rest frame. For $\omega \gtrsim m_\mu$ the scalar and pseudoscalar cross sections quickly approach each other, while asymptotic agreement with the vector case requires very large energies.
  • Figure 4: Top: Charged-particle abundances in our reference model shown in Fig. \ref{['fig:SNProfile']}. The difference between $Y_e+Y_\mu$ and $Y_p$ highlights the appearance of light nuclei or nuclear clusters in the decoupling region. Bottom: Average screening factor $f_{\rm s}$ for Primakoff scattering defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:ScreeningFactor']}. The red line is the Rosseland average, the blue line a thermal average for boson emission as explained in the text.
  • Figure 5: Time and radial evolution of the temperature (top panel), baryon number density normalized to nuclear density $n_0 = 0.181\, {\rm fm}^{-3}$ (central panel), and muon abundance $Y_\mu$ for the SN model SFHo-18.8 Bollig:2020xdr that was also used in Fig. \ref{['fig:SNProfile']}.
  • ...and 7 more figures