Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Fractional Helly theorem for Cartesian products of convex sets

Debsoumya Chakraborti, Jaehoon Kim, Jinha Kim, Minki Kim, Hong Liu

Abstract

Helly's theorem and its variants show that for a family of convex sets in Euclidean space, local intersection patterns influence global intersection patterns. A classical result of Eckhoff in 1988 provided an optimal fractional Helly theorem for axis-aligned boxes, which are Cartesian products of line segments. Answering a question raised by Bárány and Kalai, and independently Lew, we generalize Eckhoff's result to Cartesian products of convex sets in all dimensions. In particular, we prove that given $α\in (1-\frac{1}{t^d},1]$ and a finite family $\mathcal{F}$ of Cartesian products of convex sets $\prod_{i\in[t]}A_i$ in $\mathbb{R}^{td}$ with $A_i\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ if at least $α$-fraction of the $(d+1)$-tuples in $\mathcal{F}$ are intersecting then at least $(1-(t^d(1-α))^{1/(d+1)})$-fraction of sets in $\mathcal{F}$ are intersecting. This is a special case of a more general result on intersections of $d$-Leray complexes. We also provide a construction showing that our result on $d$-Leray complexes is optimal. Interestingly the extremal example is representable as a family of cartesian products of convex sets, implying the bound $α>1-\frac{1}{t^d}$ and the fraction $(1-(t^d(1-α))^{1/(d+1)})$ above are also best possible. The well-known optimal construction for fractional Helly theorem for convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ does not have $(p,d+1)$-condition for sublinear $p$. Inspired by this we give constructions showing that, somewhat surprisingly, imposing additional $(p,d+1)$-condition has negligible effect on improving the quantitative bounds in neither the fractional Helly theorem for convex sets nor Cartesian products of convex sets. Our constructions offer a rich family of distinct extremal configurations for fractional Helly theorem, implying in a sense that the optimal bound is stable.

Fractional Helly theorem for Cartesian products of convex sets

Abstract

Helly's theorem and its variants show that for a family of convex sets in Euclidean space, local intersection patterns influence global intersection patterns. A classical result of Eckhoff in 1988 provided an optimal fractional Helly theorem for axis-aligned boxes, which are Cartesian products of line segments. Answering a question raised by Bárány and Kalai, and independently Lew, we generalize Eckhoff's result to Cartesian products of convex sets in all dimensions. In particular, we prove that given and a finite family of Cartesian products of convex sets in with if at least -fraction of the -tuples in are intersecting then at least -fraction of sets in are intersecting. This is a special case of a more general result on intersections of -Leray complexes. We also provide a construction showing that our result on -Leray complexes is optimal. Interestingly the extremal example is representable as a family of cartesian products of convex sets, implying the bound and the fraction above are also best possible. The well-known optimal construction for fractional Helly theorem for convex sets in does not have -condition for sublinear . Inspired by this we give constructions showing that, somewhat surprisingly, imposing additional -condition has negligible effect on improving the quantitative bounds in neither the fractional Helly theorem for convex sets nor Cartesian products of convex sets. Our constructions offer a rich family of distinct extremal configurations for fractional Helly theorem, implying in a sense that the optimal bound is stable.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 15 theorems, 28 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $d,r$, and $n$ be positive integers such that $n>d+r$, and $\mathcal{F}$ is a family of $n$ convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$. If more than $\binom{n}{d+1}-\binom{n-r}{d+1}$ of the $(d+1)$-tuples of the family $\mathcal{F}$ are intersecting, then $\mathcal{F}$ contains an intersecting subfamily of s

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: If $A=A_{k+1}$ then conditions (ii), (iii), and (iv) hold.
  • Figure 2: $A_5$ is obtained by modifying $A$. It satisfies (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv).

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 1.1: The fractional Helly Theorem
  • Proposition 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Turán's theorem, Tur41
  • Theorem \ref{thm:leray_intersection}
  • ...and 19 more