Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Pila--Wilkie theorem for Hensel minimal curves

Victoria Cantoral-Farfán, Kien Huu Nguyen, Mathias Stout, Floris Vermeulen

Abstract

Recently, a new axiomatic framework for tameness in henselian valued fields was developed by Cluckers, Halupczok, Rideau-Kikuchi and Vermeulen and termed Hensel minimality. In this article we develop Diophantine applications of Hensel minimality. We prove a Pila--Wilkie type theorem for transcendental curves definable in Hensel minimal structures. In order to do so, we introduce a new notion of point counting in this context related to dimension counting over the residue field. We examine multiple classes of examples, showcasing the need for this new dimension counting and prove that our bounds are optimal.

A Pila--Wilkie theorem for Hensel minimal curves

Abstract

Recently, a new axiomatic framework for tameness in henselian valued fields was developed by Cluckers, Halupczok, Rideau-Kikuchi and Vermeulen and termed Hensel minimality. In this article we develop Diophantine applications of Hensel minimality. We prove a Pila--Wilkie type theorem for transcendental curves definable in Hensel minimal structures. In order to do so, we introduce a new notion of point counting in this context related to dimension counting over the residue field. We examine multiple classes of examples, showcasing the need for this new dimension counting and prove that our bounds are optimal.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 17 theorems, 84 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2.1

Suppose that $K$ is a henselian valued field of equicharacteristic $0$ equipped with a 1-h-minimal structure. Fix a pseudo-uniformizer $t$ and a lift of the residue field $\tilde{k}$. Suppose that $\mathrm{acl}=\mathrm{dcl}$ in $K$ and that the subgroup of $b$-th powers in $k^\times$ has finite inde Furthermore, the constant $N$ can be taken to hold uniformly throughout all transcendental members

Theorems & Definitions (42)

  • Definition 2.1.1
  • Theorem 2.2.1
  • Theorem 2.2.2
  • Theorem 2.2.3
  • Proposition 2.3.1
  • proof
  • Example 2.4.1
  • Example 2.4.2
  • Example 2.4.3
  • Theorem 3.2.1: CHR, Jacobian property
  • ...and 32 more