Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The canonical wall structure and intrinsic mirror symmetry

Mark Gross, Bernd Siebert

Abstract

As announced "Intrinsic mirror symmetry and punctured invariants" in 2016, we construct and prove consistency of the canonical wall structure. This construction starts with a log Calabi-Yau pair (X,D) and produces a wall structure, as defined by Gross-Hacking-Siebert. Roughly put, the canonical wall structure is a data structure which encodes an algebro-geometric analogue of counts of Maslov index zero disks. These enumerative invariants are defined in terms of the punctured invariants of Abramovich-Chen-Gross-Siebert. There are then two main theorems of the paper. First, we prove consistency of the canonical wall structure, so that the canonical wall structure gives rise to a mirror family. Second, we prove that this mirror family coincides with the intrinsic mirror constructed in our paper "Intrinsic mirror symmetry". While the setup of this paper is narrower than that of the latter paper, it gives a more detailed description of the mirror.

The canonical wall structure and intrinsic mirror symmetry

Abstract

As announced "Intrinsic mirror symmetry and punctured invariants" in 2016, we construct and prove consistency of the canonical wall structure. This construction starts with a log Calabi-Yau pair (X,D) and produces a wall structure, as defined by Gross-Hacking-Siebert. Roughly put, the canonical wall structure is a data structure which encodes an algebro-geometric analogue of counts of Maslov index zero disks. These enumerative invariants are defined in terms of the punctured invariants of Abramovich-Chen-Gross-Siebert. There are then two main theorems of the paper. First, we prove consistency of the canonical wall structure, so that the canonical wall structure gives rise to a mirror family. Second, we prove that this mirror family coincides with the intrinsic mirror constructed in our paper "Intrinsic mirror symmetry". While the setup of this paper is narrower than that of the latter paper, it gives a more detailed description of the mirror.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 22 sections, 35 theorems, 237 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1.3

If $(X,D)$ satisfies Assumptions ass:absolute or ass:relative in the absolute or relative cases respectively, then $(B,\mathscr{P})$ is a pseudomanifold in the sense of satisfying conditions (1)--(5) of Theta. Further, for each one-dimensional good stratum $X_{\rho}$, either (a) $X_{\rho}\cong \math

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1.1: Sketch of $(X,D)$ in Example \ref{['ex:running example 1']}.
  • Figure 1.2: The two-dimensional stratum $X_\omega$.
  • Figure 4.1: The tropical type $\omega_0$ (codimension zero case).

Theorems & Definitions (95)

  • Proposition 1.3
  • proof
  • Example 1.4
  • Definition 1.5
  • Proposition 1.6
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Proposition 1.8
  • proof
  • Remark 1.9
  • ...and 85 more