Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Atkinson formula for the $ζ$ function

Daniele Dona, Sebastian Zuniga Alterman

Abstract

Thanks to Littlewood (1922) and Ingham (1928), we know the first two terms of the asymptotic formula for the square mean integral value of the Riemann zeta function $ζ$ on the critical line. Later, Atkinson (1939) presented this formula with an error term of order $O(\sqrt{T}\log^{2}(T))$, which we call the Atkinson formula. Following the latter approach and the work of Titchmarsh (1986), we present an explicit version of the Atkinson formula, improving on a recent bound by Simonič (2020). Moreover, we extend the Atkinson formula to the range $\Re(s)\in\left[\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}\right]$, giving an explicit bound for the square mean integral value of $ζ$ and improving on a bound by Helfgott and the authors (2019). We use mostly classical tools, such as the approximate functional equation and the explicit convexity bounds of the zeta function given by Backlund (1918).

On the Atkinson formula for the $ζ$ function

Abstract

Thanks to Littlewood (1922) and Ingham (1928), we know the first two terms of the asymptotic formula for the square mean integral value of the Riemann zeta function on the critical line. Later, Atkinson (1939) presented this formula with an error term of order , which we call the Atkinson formula. Following the latter approach and the work of Titchmarsh (1986), we present an explicit version of the Atkinson formula, improving on a recent bound by Simonič (2020). Moreover, we extend the Atkinson formula to the range , giving an explicit bound for the square mean integral value of and improving on a bound by Helfgott and the authors (2019). We use mostly classical tools, such as the approximate functional equation and the explicit convexity bounds of the zeta function given by Backlund (1918).

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 22 theorems, 173 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $T\geq T_0=\sage{T0}$. Then Furthermore, if $\frac{1}{4}\leq\tau<\frac{1}{2}$, then whereas, if $\frac{1}{2}<\tau\leq\frac{3}{4}$, then

Theorems & Definitions (38)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 2.1: Explicit Stirling's formula
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3: Explicit convexity bounds of $\zeta$
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.6
  • ...and 28 more