Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Energy-based Control and Observer Design for higher-order infinite-dimensional Port-Hamiltonian Systems

Tobias Malzer, Lukas Ecker, Markus Schöberl

Abstract

In this paper, we present a control-design method based on the energy-Casimir method for infinite-dimensional, boundary-actuated port-Hamiltonian systems with two-dimensional spatial domain and second-order Hamiltonian. The resulting control law depends on distributed system states that cannot be measured, and therefore, we additionally design an infinite-dimensional observer by exploiting the port-Hamiltonian system representation. A Kirchhoff-Love plate serves as an example in order to demonstrate the proposed approaches.

Energy-based Control and Observer Design for higher-order infinite-dimensional Port-Hamiltonian Systems

Abstract

In this paper, we present a control-design method based on the energy-Casimir method for infinite-dimensional, boundary-actuated port-Hamiltonian systems with two-dimensional spatial domain and second-order Hamiltonian. The resulting control law depends on distributed system states that cannot be measured, and therefore, we additionally design an infinite-dimensional observer by exploiting the port-Hamiltonian system representation. A Kirchhoff-Love plate serves as an example in order to demonstrate the proposed approaches.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 4 theorems, 108 equations, 7 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 5

Consider the closed-loop system stemming from the interconnection of the plant (eq:boundary_controlled_ipH_non_diff_op) and the controller (eq:fpH_controller) by means of (eq:PCIS_feedback_2D). Thus, (eq:Casimir_functions_fpH_controller_2D_2D_plant) are structural invariants if they meet the conditi

Figures (7)

  • Figure 3: Force distribution of the actuators over $z^{1}$.
  • Figure 4: Final plate deflection $w(z^{1},z^{2},T_{end})$ over $\mathcal{B}$.
  • Figure 5: Simulation result for the deflection $w$ of the edge $\partial\mathcal{B}_{2}$ over time $t$ and coordinate $z^{1}$.
  • Figure 6: Comparison of the measurement $w(L_{1},\frac{L_{2}}{2},t)$ and the observer state $\hat{w}(L_{1},\frac{L_{2}}{2},t)$.
  • Figure 7: Final plate deflection $w(z^{1},z^{2},T_{end})$ over $\mathcal{B}$.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Example 3: Boundary-actuated Kirchhoff-Love plate
  • Remark 4
  • Theorem 5: Structural Invariants
  • Remark 6
  • Example 7: Casimir-based Controller for Ex. 2
  • Theorem 8: Observer Design
  • Example 9: Observer Design for Ex. 2
  • Example 10: Boundary-actuated Kirchhoff-Love plate
  • Remark 11
  • Theorem 12: Structural Invariants
  • ...and 4 more