Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On logical parameterizations and functional representability in local set theories

Enrique Ruiz Hernández, Pedro Solórzano

Abstract

There is a well-known inclusion $ι_\mathscr{E}$ of a topos $\mathscr{E}$ in the linguistic topos $\mathscr{T}(Σ)$ of its internal language $Σ$ that proves both toposes to be equivalent. There is also a canonical translation $η_S$ for any local set theory $S$ into the local set theory $Σ$ of its linguistic topos. Starting from a local set theory, this yields two a priori distinct inclusions from $\mathscr{T}(S)$ to $\mathscr{T}(Σ)$. Herein, these two functors are proved to be isomorphic. Furthermore, the concept of logical parameterization is investigated and then applied to see that $ι_{\mathscr{T}(S)}$ parameterizes $\mathscr{T}(η_S)$ in such a way that syntactic $S$-functions are represented by themselves in $Σ$.

On logical parameterizations and functional representability in local set theories

Abstract

There is a well-known inclusion of a topos in the linguistic topos of its internal language that proves both toposes to be equivalent. There is also a canonical translation for any local set theory into the local set theory of its linguistic topos. Starting from a local set theory, this yields two a priori distinct inclusions from to . Herein, these two functors are proved to be isomorphic. Furthermore, the concept of logical parameterization is investigated and then applied to see that parameterizes in such a way that syntactic -functions are represented by themselves in .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 24 theorems, 158 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.3.1

Let $X,Y,\lvert f\rvert$ be $S$-sets with $\vdash_S\lvert f\rvert\subseteq X\times Y$. Then, $x\in X\vdash_S\exists!y\in Y(\langle x,y\rangle\in\lvert f\rvert)$ if and only if $x\in X\vdash_S\exists y\in Y(\langle x,y\rangle\in\lvert f\rvert)$ and $\langle x,y\rangle\in\lvert f\rvert,\langle x,y'\ra

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Proposition 1.3.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 1.4.1: MR972257, 3.16.4
  • Lemma 1.5.3
  • proof
  • Remark 1.5.4
  • Theorem 1.6.3: MR972257 3.36
  • Theorem 1.6.4: MR972257 3.37
  • Remark 2.1.2
  • Definition 2.1.3
  • ...and 39 more