Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Discrepancy in modular arithmetic progressions

Jacob Fox, Max Wenqiang Xu, Yunkun Zhou

Abstract

Celebrated theorems of Roth and of Matoušek and Spencer together show that the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in the first $n$ positive integers is $Θ(n^{1/4})$. We study the analogous problem in the $\mathbb{Z}_n$ setting. We asymptotically determine the logarithm of the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ for all positive integer $n$. We further determine up to a constant factor the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ for many $n$. For example, if $n=p^k$ is a prime power, then the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ is $Θ(n^{1/3+r_k/(6k)})$, where $r_k \in \{0,1,2\}$ is the remainder when $k$ is divided by $3$. This solves a problem of Hebbinghaus and Srivastav.

Discrepancy in modular arithmetic progressions

Abstract

Celebrated theorems of Roth and of Matoušek and Spencer together show that the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in the first positive integers is . We study the analogous problem in the setting. We asymptotically determine the logarithm of the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in for all positive integer . We further determine up to a constant factor the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in for many . For example, if is a prime power, then the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in is , where is the remainder when is divided by . This solves a problem of Hebbinghaus and Srivastav.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 23 theorems, 170 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

There exists an absolute constant $c > 0$ such that for any positive integer $n$,

Theorems & Definitions (44)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1: Section 4.6 in Mat
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • ...and 34 more