Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Stable moduli spaces of hermitian forms

Fabian Hebestreit, Wolfgang Steimle

TL;DR

The paper develops a stable ∞-categorical framework for hermitian K-theory by viewing Grothendieck-Witt spaces as group completions of moduli spaces of Poincaré-objects, even without inverting 2. It introduces weight structures and parametrised algebraic surgery to compare GW-spaces with derived K- and L-theoretic data, providing a general proof strategy via an algebraic cobordism category Cob(C,Qoppa). The main contributions include a weight-theorem identifying GW(C,Qoppa) with the group completion of the heart's Poincaré forms, and a parametrised surgery argument that yields equivalences between cobordism subcategories and thus explicit descriptions of GW-spaces in terms of derived categories; these results recover classical GW-spaces for rings and produce fiber sequences relating K- and L-theory in broad settings. The framework also extends to rings, form parameters, and even spectra, offering a robust, 2-agnostic approach with potential applications to the cohomology of orthogonal groups and beyond, thereby unifying classical hermitian K-theory with modern stable ∞-categorical methods.

Abstract

We prove that Grothendieck-Witt spaces of Poincaré categories are, in many cases, group completions of certain moduli spaces of hermitian forms. This, in particular, identifies Karoubi's classical hermitian and quadratic K-groups with the genuine Grothendieck-Witt groups from our joint work with Calmès, Dotto, Harpaz, Land, Moi, Nardin and Nikolaus, and thereby completes our solution of several conjectures in hermitian K-theory. The method of proof is abstracted from work of Galatius and Randal-Williams on cobordism categories of manifolds using the identification of the Grothendieck-Witt space of a Poincaré category as the homotopy type of the associated cobordism category.

Stable moduli spaces of hermitian forms

TL;DR

The paper develops a stable ∞-categorical framework for hermitian K-theory by viewing Grothendieck-Witt spaces as group completions of moduli spaces of Poincaré-objects, even without inverting 2. It introduces weight structures and parametrised algebraic surgery to compare GW-spaces with derived K- and L-theoretic data, providing a general proof strategy via an algebraic cobordism category Cob(C,Qoppa). The main contributions include a weight-theorem identifying GW(C,Qoppa) with the group completion of the heart's Poincaré forms, and a parametrised surgery argument that yields equivalences between cobordism subcategories and thus explicit descriptions of GW-spaces in terms of derived categories; these results recover classical GW-spaces for rings and produce fiber sequences relating K- and L-theory in broad settings. The framework also extends to rings, form parameters, and even spectra, offering a robust, 2-agnostic approach with potential applications to the cohomology of orthogonal groups and beyond, thereby unifying classical hermitian K-theory with modern stable ∞-categorical methods.

Abstract

We prove that Grothendieck-Witt spaces of Poincaré categories are, in many cases, group completions of certain moduli spaces of hermitian forms. This, in particular, identifies Karoubi's classical hermitian and quadratic K-groups with the genuine Grothendieck-Witt groups from our joint work with Calmès, Dotto, Harpaz, Land, Moi, Nardin and Nikolaus, and thereby completes our solution of several conjectures in hermitian K-theory. The method of proof is abstracted from work of Galatius and Randal-Williams on cobordism categories of manifolds using the identification of the Grothendieck-Witt space of a Poincaré category as the homotopy type of the associated cobordism category.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 37 sections, 85 theorems, 428 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $R$ be a commutative ring and $\lambda\in \{\mathrm{s}, {-\mathrm{s}}, \mathrm{q}, {-\mathrm{q}}\}$. Then the canonical map is an equivalence.

Theorems & Definitions (201)

  • Theorem A
  • Corollary
  • Corollary
  • Theorem B
  • Theorem C
  • Definition 3.1.1
  • Lemma 3.1.2
  • proof
  • Example 3.1.3
  • Lemma 3.1.4
  • ...and 191 more