Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Finite convergence of sum-of-squares hierarchies for the stability number of a graph

Monique Laurent, Luis Felipe Vargas

Abstract

We investigate a hierarchy of semidefinite bounds $\vartheta^{(r)}(G)$ for the stability number $α(G)$ of a graph $G$, based on its copositive programming formulation and introduced by de Klerk and Pasechnik [{\em SIAM J. Optim.} 12 (2002), pp.875--892], who conjectured convergence to $α(G)$ in $r=α(G)-1$ steps. Even the weaker conjecture claiming finite convergence is still open. We establish links between this hierarchy and sum-of-squares hierarchies based on the Motzkin-Straus formulation of $α(G)$, which we use to show finite convergence when $G$ is acritical, i.e., when $α(G\setminus e)=α(G)$ for all edges $e$ of $G$. This relies, in particular, on understanding the structure of the minimizers of the Motzkin-Straus formulation and showing that their number is finite precisely when $G$ is acritical. Moreover we show that these results hold in the general setting of the weighted stable set problem for graphs equipped with positive node weights. In addition, as a byproduct we show that deciding whether a standard quadratic program has finitely many minimizers does not admit a polynomial-time algorithm unless P=NP.

Finite convergence of sum-of-squares hierarchies for the stability number of a graph

Abstract

We investigate a hierarchy of semidefinite bounds for the stability number of a graph , based on its copositive programming formulation and introduced by de Klerk and Pasechnik [{\em SIAM J. Optim.} 12 (2002), pp.875--892], who conjectured convergence to in steps. Even the weaker conjecture claiming finite convergence is still open. We establish links between this hierarchy and sum-of-squares hierarchies based on the Motzkin-Straus formulation of , which we use to show finite convergence when is acritical, i.e., when for all edges of . This relies, in particular, on understanding the structure of the minimizers of the Motzkin-Straus formulation and showing that their number is finite precisely when is acritical. Moreover we show that these results hold in the general setting of the weighted stable set problem for graphs equipped with positive node weights. In addition, as a byproduct we show that deciding whether a standard quadratic program has finitely many minimizers does not admit a polynomial-time algorithm unless P=NP.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 29 theorems, 74 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Assume the feasible region $K$ of poly-opt is compact. Then any polynomial that is strictly positive on $K$ belongs to ${\mathcal{T}}(g)+\langle h\rangle$ (Schmüdgen Schmudgen). If in addition ${\mathcal{M}}(g)+\langle h\rangle$ is Archimedean, then any polynomial that is strictly positive on $K$ be

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Graph $G$ (left), graph $H_1$ (middle), graph $H_2$ (right)

Theorems & Definitions (53)

  • Conjecture 1: De Klerk and Pasechnik dKP2002
  • Conjecture 2
  • Example 1.1
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: see, e.g., Bertsekas/99
  • Theorem 2.3: Nie Nie
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • ...and 43 more