Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Towards a precision calculation of $N_{\rm eff}$ in the Standard Model II: Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED

Jack J. Bennett, Gilles Buldgen, Pablo F. de Salas, Marco Drewes, Stefano Gariazzo, Sergio Pastor, Yvonne Y. Y. Wong

TL;DR

This work delivers a state-of-the-art calculation of the SM benchmark value for the effective number of neutrinos, N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM}, by integrating neutrino flavour oscillations, finite-temperature QED corrections to ${\cal O}(e^3)$, and a full neutrino–neutrino collision integral into a precision decoupling framework. The authors quantify uncertainties from modelling choices, oscillation parameters, and numerical convergence, and demonstrate that including the full collision integral and the ${\cal O}(e^3)$ QED corrections shifts N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM} to 3.0440 with a tight ±0.0002 error. They also show that the dominant uncertainty arises from numerical solution, with a subdominant contribution from the solar mixing angle sin^2 θ_{12}. The results align with recent independent calculations and refine the SM baseline used to constrain beyond-Standard-Model light relics via cosmological measurements.

Abstract

We present in this work a new calculation of the standard-model benchmark value for the effective number of neutrinos, $N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM}$, that quantifies the cosmological neutrino-to-photon energy densities. The calculation takes into account neutrino flavour oscillations, finite-temperature effects in the quantum electrodynamics plasma to ${\cal O}(e^3)$, where $e$ is the elementary electric charge, and a full evaluation of the neutrino--neutrino collision integral. We provide furthermore a detailed assessment of the uncertainties in the benchmark $N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM}$ value, through testing the value's dependence on (i)~optional approximate modelling of the weak collision integrals, (ii)~measurement errors in the physical parameters of the weak sector, and (iii)~numerical convergence, particularly in relation to momentum discretisation. Our new, recommended standard-model benchmark is $N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM} = 3.0440 \pm 0.0002$, where the nominal uncertainty is attributed predominantly to errors incurred in the numerical solution procedure ($|δN_{\rm eff}| \sim10^{-4}$), augmented by measurement errors in the solar mixing angle $\sin^2θ_{12}$ ($|δN_{\rm eff}| \sim10^{-4}$).

Towards a precision calculation of $N_{\rm eff}$ in the Standard Model II: Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED

TL;DR

This work delivers a state-of-the-art calculation of the SM benchmark value for the effective number of neutrinos, N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM}, by integrating neutrino flavour oscillations, finite-temperature QED corrections to , and a full neutrino–neutrino collision integral into a precision decoupling framework. The authors quantify uncertainties from modelling choices, oscillation parameters, and numerical convergence, and demonstrate that including the full collision integral and the QED corrections shifts N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM} to 3.0440 with a tight ±0.0002 error. They also show that the dominant uncertainty arises from numerical solution, with a subdominant contribution from the solar mixing angle sin^2 θ_{12}. The results align with recent independent calculations and refine the SM baseline used to constrain beyond-Standard-Model light relics via cosmological measurements.

Abstract

We present in this work a new calculation of the standard-model benchmark value for the effective number of neutrinos, , that quantifies the cosmological neutrino-to-photon energy densities. The calculation takes into account neutrino flavour oscillations, finite-temperature effects in the quantum electrodynamics plasma to , where is the elementary electric charge, and a full evaluation of the neutrino--neutrino collision integral. We provide furthermore a detailed assessment of the uncertainties in the benchmark value, through testing the value's dependence on (i)~optional approximate modelling of the weak collision integrals, (ii)~measurement errors in the physical parameters of the weak sector, and (iii)~numerical convergence, particularly in relation to momentum discretisation. Our new, recommended standard-model benchmark is , where the nominal uncertainty is attributed predominantly to errors incurred in the numerical solution procedure (), augmented by measurement errors in the solar mixing angle ().

Paper Structure

This paper contains 35 sections, 30 equations, 7 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Diagrammatic expression for the ${\cal O}(e^2)$ and ${\cal O}(e^3)$ corrections to the finite-temperature QED partition function. The filled black circles represent one-particle irreducible photon self-energies at finite temperature.
  • Figure 2:
  • Figure 3: Change in $N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM}$ in a full calculation including the complete neutrino--neutrino collision integral, with respect to variations in the number of $y$-nodes and their range. Top: Variations in $N_y$ and $y_{\rm min}$ using the Newton--Cotes quadrature method. Bottom left: Variations in $N_y$ and $y_{\rm max}$ using the Newton--Cotes quadrature method. Bottom right: Variations in $N_y$ and $y_{\rm max}$ using the Gauss--Laguerre quadrature method. The setting used in our benchmark full calculation including the complete neutrino--neutrino collision integral ($y_{\rm min}=0.01$ where applicable, $y_{\rm max}=30$, and $N_y = 80$) is marked by a red dot on each plot.
  • Figure 4: Change in $N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM}$ with respect to variations in the initialisation time $x_{\rm in}$. The default choice is $x_{\rm in} = 0.001$. The solid red and blue lines denote the full calculation including the full neutrino--neutrino collision term using respectively the GL and the NC methods, while the green dotted line represents the minimum set-up computed with NC.
  • Figure 5: Left: Fractional change in percent in the comoving energy density relative to the initial state at $x_{\rm in}=0.001$, under variations of the quadrature method (Gauss--Laguerre vs Newton--Cotes), the number of $y$-nodes $N_y$, and modelling of the collision integral ${\cal I}[\varrho]$. Right: Fractional change in percent in the comoving number density.
  • ...and 2 more figures