Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On local zeta-integrals for GSp(4) and GSp(4) x GL(2)

David Loeffler

Abstract

We prove that Novodvorsky's definition of local L-factors for generic representations of GSp(4) x GL(2) is compatible with the local Langlands correspondence when the GL(2) representation is non-supercuspidal. We also give an interpretation in terms of Langlands parameters of the "exceptional" poles of the GSp(4) x GL(2) L-factor, and of the "subregular" poles of the GSp(4) L-factor studied in recent work of Roesner and Weissauer.

On local zeta-integrals for GSp(4) and GSp(4) x GL(2)

Abstract

We prove that Novodvorsky's definition of local L-factors for generic representations of GSp(4) x GL(2) is compatible with the local Langlands correspondence when the GL(2) representation is non-supercuspidal. We also give an interpretation in terms of Langlands parameters of the "exceptional" poles of the GSp(4) x GL(2) L-factor, and of the "subregular" poles of the GSp(4) L-factor studied in recent work of Roesner and Weissauer.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 34 sections, 30 theorems, 43 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

conj:compat holds under the additional assumption that the $\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}\nolimits(2, F)$-representation $\sigma$ be non-super-cuspidal.

Theorems & Definitions (68)

  • Conjecture \greekconjecture
  • Theorem A
  • Conjecture \greekconjecture
  • Theorem B
  • Theorem C
  • Remark 1
  • Conjecture \greekconjecture
  • Theorem D
  • Remark 2
  • Conjecture \greekconjecture
  • ...and 58 more