Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Algebraic independence and linear difference equations

Boris Adamczewski, Thomas Dreyfus, Charlotte Hardouin, Michael Wibmer

Abstract

We consider pairs of automorphisms $(φ,σ)$ acting on fields of Laurent or Puiseux series: pairs of shift operators $(φ\colon x\mapsto x+h_1, σ\colon x\mapsto x+h_2)$, of $q$-difference operators $(φ\colon x\mapsto q_1x,\ σ\colon x\mapsto q_2x)$, and of Mahler operators $(φ\colon x\mapsto x^{p_1},\ σ\colon x\mapsto x^{p_2})$. Given a solution $f$ to a linear $φ$-equation and a solution $g$ to a linear $σ$-equation, both transcendental, we show that $f$ and $g$ are algebraically independent over the field of rational functions, assuming that the corresponding parameters are sufficiently independent. As a consequence, we settle a conjecture about Mahler functions put forward by Loxton and van der Poorten in 1987. We also give an application to the algebraic independence of $q$-hypergeometric functions. Our approach provides a general strategy to study this kind of question and is based on a suitable Galois theory: the $σ$-Galois theory of linear $φ$-equations.

Algebraic independence and linear difference equations

Abstract

We consider pairs of automorphisms acting on fields of Laurent or Puiseux series: pairs of shift operators , of -difference operators , and of Mahler operators . Given a solution to a linear -equation and a solution to a linear -equation, both transcendental, we show that and are algebraically independent over the field of rational functions, assuming that the corresponding parameters are sufficiently independent. As a consequence, we settle a conjecture about Mahler functions put forward by Loxton and van der Poorten in 1987. We also give an application to the algebraic independence of -hypergeometric functions. Our approach provides a general strategy to study this kind of question and is based on a suitable Galois theory: the -Galois theory of linear -equations.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 23 sections, 36 theorems, 45 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $K$, $F$, and $(\phi,\sigma)$ be defined as in Cases 2S, 2Q, and 2M. Then an element $f\in F$ cannot satisfy both a linear $\phi$-difference equation and a linear $\sigma$-difference equation with coefficients in $K$, unless it belongs to $K$.

Theorems & Definitions (83)

  • Theorem 1.1: Schäfke and Singer
  • Remark 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Conjecture 1.5: Loxton and van der Poorten
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Remark 2.1
  • Definition 2.2: Definition 2.2 in OvWib
  • Proposition 2.3
  • ...and 73 more