Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Jacobson-Morozov Lemma for Algebraic Supergroups

Inna Entova-Aizenbud, Vera Serganova

TL;DR

The paper develops an odd Jacobson–Morozov theory for quasi-reductive algebraic supergroups by introducing neatness for odd nilpotent elements and constructing a universal semisimple quotient via a symmetric monoidal functor $\Phi_x = S\circ R_x$ from $\mathrm{Rep}(G)$ to $\mathrm{Rep}(OSp(1|2))$. It proves that a nonzero neat odd element $x$ in $\mathrm{Lie}(G)_{\bar{1}}$ yields an embedding of $OSp(1|2)$ into $G$ extending the corresponding $\mathbb{G}_a^{(1|1)}$-embedding, with uniqueness up to $G_{\bar{0}}$-conjugacy. The work develops a Deligne filtration realization of $\Phi_x$, relates the construction to the Duflo–Serganova functor, and introduces the minuscule supergroup $\mathbb{M}$ as a universal emitter of neat indecomposables whose semisimplification recovers $Rep(OSp(1|2))$. It further investigates the structure of neat elements, the finiteness of neat orbits, and reductive envelopes, providing a robust categorical framework for extending odd nilpotent data to full supergroup embeddings with applications to representation theory of algebraic supergroups.

Abstract

Given a quasi-reductive algebraic supergroup $G$, we use the theory of semisimplifications of symmetric monoidal categories to define a symmetric monoidal functor $Φ_x: Rep(G) \to Rep(OSp(1|2))$ associated to any given element $x \in \mathrm{Lie}(G)_{\bar 1}$. For nilpotent elements $x$, we show that the functor $Φ_x$ can be defined using the Deligne filtration associated to $x$. We use this approach to prove an analogue of the Jacobson-Morozov Lemma for algebraic supergroups. Namely, we give a necessary and sufficient condition on odd nilpotent elements $x\in \mathrm{Lie}(G)_{\bar 1}$ which define an embedding of supergroups $OSp(1|2)\to G$ so that $x$ lies in the image of the corresponding Lie algebra homomorphism.

Jacobson-Morozov Lemma for Algebraic Supergroups

TL;DR

The paper develops an odd Jacobson–Morozov theory for quasi-reductive algebraic supergroups by introducing neatness for odd nilpotent elements and constructing a universal semisimple quotient via a symmetric monoidal functor from to . It proves that a nonzero neat odd element in yields an embedding of into extending the corresponding -embedding, with uniqueness up to -conjugacy. The work develops a Deligne filtration realization of , relates the construction to the Duflo–Serganova functor, and introduces the minuscule supergroup as a universal emitter of neat indecomposables whose semisimplification recovers . It further investigates the structure of neat elements, the finiteness of neat orbits, and reductive envelopes, providing a robust categorical framework for extending odd nilpotent data to full supergroup embeddings with applications to representation theory of algebraic supergroups.

Abstract

Given a quasi-reductive algebraic supergroup , we use the theory of semisimplifications of symmetric monoidal categories to define a symmetric monoidal functor associated to any given element . For nilpotent elements , we show that the functor can be defined using the Deligne filtration associated to . We use this approach to prove an analogue of the Jacobson-Morozov Lemma for algebraic supergroups. Namely, we give a necessary and sufficient condition on odd nilpotent elements which define an embedding of supergroups so that lies in the image of the corresponding Lie algebra homomorphism.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 33 theorems, 79 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $G$ be a quasi-reductive algebraic supergroup, and $\mathfrak{g}=Lie(G)$ its Lie superalgebra. Let $x \in \mathfrak{g}_{\bar{1}}, x\neq 0$ be a nilpotent element such that $x\rvert_V$ is neat, for every finite dimensional (algebraic) representation $V$ of $G$. Let $i:\mathbb{G}_a^{(1|1)} \hookri

Theorems & Definitions (99)

  • Definition
  • Theorem 1
  • Remark 2
  • Definition 2.2.1
  • Definition 2.2.2
  • Theorem 2.2.3
  • Remark 2.2.4
  • Definition 2.2.5
  • Remark 2.3.1
  • Lemma 2.3.2
  • ...and 89 more