Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Zγ transverse-momentum spectrum at NNLO+N3LL

Marius Wiesemann, Luca Rottoli, Paolo Torrielli

Abstract

We consider the transverse-momentum ($p_T$) distribution of $Zγ$ pairs produced in hadronic collisions. Logarithmically enhanced contributions at small $p_T$ are resummed to all orders in QCD perturbation theory and combined with the fixed-order prediction. We achieve the most advanced prediction for the $Zγ$ $p_T$ spectrum by matching next-to-next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (N$^3$LL) resummation to the integrated cross section at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO). By considering $\ell^+\ell^-γ$ production at the fully differential level, including spin correlations, interferences and off-shell effects, arbitrary cuts can be applied to the leptons and the photon. We present results at the LHC in presence of fiducial cuts and find agreement with the $13$\,TeV ATLAS data at the few-percent level.

The Zγ transverse-momentum spectrum at NNLO+N3LL

Abstract

We consider the transverse-momentum () distribution of pairs produced in hadronic collisions. Logarithmically enhanced contributions at small are resummed to all orders in QCD perturbation theory and combined with the fixed-order prediction. We achieve the most advanced prediction for the spectrum by matching next-to-next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) resummation to the integrated cross section at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO). By considering production at the fully differential level, including spin correlations, interferences and off-shell effects, arbitrary cuts can be applied to the leptons and the photon. We present results at the LHC in presence of fiducial cuts and find agreement with the \,TeV ATLAS data at the few-percent level.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 equations, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Feynman diagrams for the production of two charged leptons and a photon: (a-b) sample tree-level diagrams in the quark-annihilation channel contributing at LO; (c) sample loop-induced diagram in the gluon-fusion channel contributing at NNLO.
  • Figure 2: Panel (a) and (c): transverse-momentum spectrum of the $Z\gamma$ pair at NLO (purple, dot-dashed) and NNLO (orange, dashed), and the expansion of the NLL (blue, dotted) and N$^3$LL (red, solid) cross section. The lower frame shows the relative difference between the fixed-order cross section and the expansion, normalized to the latter. Panel (b) and (d): the upper frame shows the difference at the cumulative level between NLO and NLL expansion (blue, dotted), and between NNLO and N$^3$LL expansion (red, solid). The lower frame shows the same results for the derivative of the cumulative cross section with respect to $\ln(p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}/{\rm GeV})$.
  • Figure 3: Panel (a) and (b): $p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ spectrum at NLO (black, dotted), NLL (brown, dash-double-dotted), and NLO+NLL (magenta, dash-dotted) in the small-$p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ (panel (a)) and large-$p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ (panel (b)) region. The lower frames show the ratio to the central NLO+NLL prediction. Panel (c) and (d): $p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ spectrum at NNLO (red, dashed), N$^3$LL (green, double-dash-dotted), and NNLO+N$^3$LL (blue, solid) in the small-$p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ (panel (a)) and large-$p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ (panel (b)) region. The lower frames show the ratio to the central NNLO+N$^3$LL prediction.
  • Figure 4: $p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ spectrum at NLO+NLL (magenta, dash-dotted) and NNLO+N$^3$LL (blue, solid) in the inclusive (panel (a)) and fiducial (panel (b)) setup. The lower frames show the ratio to the central NNLO+N$^3$LL prediction.
  • Figure 5: $p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ spectrum at NNLO+N$^3$LL in the additive matching scheme (blue, solid) and in the multiplicative matching scheme (green, long-dashed) in the inclusive (panel (a) and (b)) and fiducial (panel (c) and (d)) setup, showing the small-$p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ (panel (a) and (c)) and large-$p_{T,\ell\ell\gamma}$ (panel (b) and (d)) region. The lower frames show the ratio to the central prediction in the additive scheme.
  • ...and 2 more figures