Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Separable algebras and coflasque resolutions

Matthew R. Ballard, Alexander Duncan, Alicia Lamarche, Patrick K. McFaddin

Abstract

Over a non-closed field, it is a common strategy to use separable algebras as invariants to distinguish algebraic and geometric objects. The most famous example is the deep connection between Severi-Brauer varieties and central simple algebras. For more general varieties, one might use endomorphism algebras of line bundles, of indecomposable vector bundles, or of exceptional objects in their derived categories. Using Galois cohomology, we describe a new invariant of reductive algebraic groups that captures precisely when this strategy will fail. Our main result characterizes this invariant in terms of coflasque resolutions of linear algebraic groups introduced by Colliot-Thélène. We determine whether or not this invariant is trivial for many fields. For number fields, we show it agrees with the Tate-Shafarevich group of the linear algebraic group, up to behavior at real places.

Separable algebras and coflasque resolutions

Abstract

Over a non-closed field, it is a common strategy to use separable algebras as invariants to distinguish algebraic and geometric objects. The most famous example is the deep connection between Severi-Brauer varieties and central simple algebras. For more general varieties, one might use endomorphism algebras of line bundles, of indecomposable vector bundles, or of exceptional objects in their derived categories. Using Galois cohomology, we describe a new invariant of reductive algebraic groups that captures precisely when this strategy will fail. Our main result characterizes this invariant in terms of coflasque resolutions of linear algebraic groups introduced by Colliot-Thélène. We determine whether or not this invariant is trivial for many fields. For number fields, we show it agrees with the Tate-Shafarevich group of the linear algebraic group, up to behavior at real places.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 31 theorems, 128 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $G$ be a (connected) reductive algebraic group over $k$. Then where is an exact sequence of algebraic groups such that

Theorems & Definitions (76)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Definition 2.1.1
  • Definition 2.1.2
  • Lemma 2.1.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.1.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.1.5
  • proof
  • ...and 66 more