Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hubble Sinks In The Low-Redshift Swampland

Aritra Banerjee, Haiying Cai, Lavinia Heisenberg, Eoin Ó Colgáin, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Tao Yang

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether Quintessence, including a string-motivated exponential coupling to dark matter, can raise the local Hubble constant $H_0$ to alleviate the Hubble tension. It employs a model-independent, low-redshift Taylor expansion around $z=0$ for the scalar field and for $H(z)$, scanning a large space of $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$ while constraining a late-time coupling $f(\phi)=e^{-C(\phi-\phi_0)}$ with $C$ fixed near observational bounds, and tests these models against cosmic chronometer, BAO, and Pantheon data up to $z\le0.7$. The main result is that uncoupled Quintessence tends to lower $H_0$ relative to $\Lambda$CDM, and even with $C\approx0.1$ the coupling does not significantly raise $H_0$ within the low-$z$ window; only scenarios with early-universe coupling (matter-dominated era or dark ages) could alter the outcome, pointing toward a high-redshift completion as necessary. These findings place low-redshift Quintessence in tension with local $H_0$ measurements and imply that the swampland-inspired resolutions, if viable, require physics beyond $z\lesssim0.7$, potentially testable via future 21-cm observations for the dark ages.

Abstract

Local determinations of the Hubble constant $H_0$ favour a higher value than Planck based on CMB and $Λ$CDM. Through a model-independent expansion, we show that low redshift ($z \lesssim 0.7$) data comprising baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), cosmic chronometers and Type Ia supernovae has a preference for Quintessence models that lower $H_0$ relative to $Λ$CDM. In addition, we confirm that an exponential coupling to dark matter cannot alter this conclusion in the same redshift range. Our results leave open the possibility that a coupling in the matter-dominated epoch, potentially even in the dark ages, may yet save $H_0$ from sinking in the string theory Swampland.

Hubble Sinks In The Low-Redshift Swampland

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether Quintessence, including a string-motivated exponential coupling to dark matter, can raise the local Hubble constant to alleviate the Hubble tension. It employs a model-independent, low-redshift Taylor expansion around for the scalar field and for , scanning a large space of while constraining a late-time coupling with fixed near observational bounds, and tests these models against cosmic chronometer, BAO, and Pantheon data up to . The main result is that uncoupled Quintessence tends to lower relative to CDM, and even with the coupling does not significantly raise within the low- window; only scenarios with early-universe coupling (matter-dominated era or dark ages) could alter the outcome, pointing toward a high-redshift completion as necessary. These findings place low-redshift Quintessence in tension with local measurements and imply that the swampland-inspired resolutions, if viable, require physics beyond , potentially testable via future 21-cm observations for the dark ages.

Abstract

Local determinations of the Hubble constant favour a higher value than Planck based on CMB and CDM. Through a model-independent expansion, we show that low redshift () data comprising baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), cosmic chronometers and Type Ia supernovae has a preference for Quintessence models that lower relative to CDM. In addition, we confirm that an exponential coupling to dark matter cannot alter this conclusion in the same redshift range. Our results leave open the possibility that a coupling in the matter-dominated epoch, potentially even in the dark ages, may yet save from sinking in the string theory Swampland.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 13 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Bounds on the CPL parametrisation Chevallier:2000qyLinder:2002et, $w(z) = w_0 + w_a z/(1+z)$, which are constructed directly from the chains of an MCMC exploration of cosmic chronometer, BAO and supernovae data restricted to $z \leq 0.7$.
  • Figure 2: Distribution of our 87,675 models, which survive our cuts, as a function of $\chi^2$ versus $H_0$. Dashed green line highlights the $\chi^2$ for $\Lambda$CDM and all models that raise $H_0$ also increase the $\chi^2$ value. In contrast 53,744 models lower both $H_0$ and $\chi^2$.
  • Figure 3: Distribution of 80,732 surviving models as a function of $\chi^2$ versus $H_0$ for the coupling $C=0.1$. Here all models that raise $H_0$ also raise the $\chi^2$, whereas 46,665 models lower $H_0$ and $\chi^2$.
  • Figure 4: The $1$ and $2 \, \sigma$ intervals for the normalised potential $V/V_0$ corresponding to CPL models that are consistent with CMB, BAO and Pantheon. For illustrative processes we plot the simplest Quintessence model, $V/V_0 = e^{-\lambda \phi}$ for different values of $\lambda$.