Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cancellation for $(G,n)$-complexes and the Swan finiteness obstruction

John Nicholson

Abstract

In previous work, we related homotopy types of finite $(G,n)$-complexes when $G$ has periodic cohomology to projective $\mathbb{Z} G$-modules representing the Swan finiteness obstruction. We use this to determine when $X \vee S^n \simeq Y \vee S^n$ implies $X \simeq Y$ for finite $(G,n)$-complexes $X$ and $Y$, and give lower bounds on the number of homotopically distinct pairs when this fails. The proof involves constructing projective $\mathbb{Z} G$-modules as lifts of locally free modules over orders in products of quaternion algebras, whose existence follows from the Eichler mass formula. In the case $n=2$, difficulties arise which lead to a new approach to finding a counterexample to Wall's D2 problem.

Cancellation for $(G,n)$-complexes and the Swan finiteness obstruction

Abstract

In previous work, we related homotopy types of finite -complexes when has periodic cohomology to projective -modules representing the Swan finiteness obstruction. We use this to determine when implies for finite -complexes and , and give lower bounds on the number of homotopically distinct pairs when this fails. The proof involves constructing projective -modules as lifts of locally free modules over orders in products of quaternion algebras, whose existence follows from the Eichler mass formula. In the case , difficulties arise which lead to a new approach to finding a counterexample to Wall's D2 problem.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 22 sections, 63 theorems, 104 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $G$ have $k$-periodic cohomology, let $n = ik$ or $ik-2$ for some $i \ge 1$ and, if $n=2$, suppose $G$ has the D2 property. Then the following are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (104)

  • Theorem 1
  • Remark 1.1
  • Theorem 2
  • Remark 1.2
  • Corollary 3
  • Remark 1.3
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • ...and 94 more