Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Integral differential forms for superelliptic curves

Sabrina Kunzweiler, Stefan Wewers

TL;DR

The paper develops a valuation-theoretic framework to compute the $\\mathcal{O}_K$-lattice $M$ of integral differential forms on a superelliptic curve $Y_K$ by constructing a regular model $X$ of $X_K = \mathbb{P}^1_K$ with a normal crossing divisor $D$ and passing to the normalization of $X$ in the function field of $Y_K$, which has only rational singularities. Central to the method are MacLane inductive valuations, residue-class discoids, and valuation trees that encode the vertical components and their intersections; these inputs drive the lattice computation $M = \{\\omega \\in M_K : v(\\omega) \\ge 0 \\forall v \\in V(Y)\\}$, where $V(Y)$ are the extensions of $V(X)$ to $F_Y$. The authors provide a concrete algorithm (with three main stages) to produce a regular model, compute a basis for $M_K$, extend valuations to $F_Y$, and intersect resulting lattices to obtain $M_Y$, with full implementations in Sage/MCLF and a dedicated module for superelliptic curves. The approach is demonstrated on explicit $p$-adic examples, yielding explicit lattice bases such as $\{5, x\}$ for certain genus-2 cases and $\{5^2, 5x, x^2-5, y\}$ for higher genus, illustrating the practical impact for arithmetic applications like BSD verifications and differential-form computations on nonregular models.

Abstract

Given a superelliptic curve $Y_K : y^n = f(x)$ over a local field $K$, we describe the theoretical background and an implementation of a new algorithm for computing the $\mathcal{O}_K$-lattice of integral differential forms on $Y_K$. We build on the results of Obus and the second author, which describe arbitrary regular models of the projective line using only valuations. One novelty of our approach is that we construct an $\mathcal{O}_K$-model of $Y_K$ with only rational singularities, but which may not be regular.

Integral differential forms for superelliptic curves

TL;DR

The paper develops a valuation-theoretic framework to compute the -lattice of integral differential forms on a superelliptic curve by constructing a regular model of with a normal crossing divisor and passing to the normalization of in the function field of , which has only rational singularities. Central to the method are MacLane inductive valuations, residue-class discoids, and valuation trees that encode the vertical components and their intersections; these inputs drive the lattice computation , where are the extensions of to . The authors provide a concrete algorithm (with three main stages) to produce a regular model, compute a basis for , extend valuations to , and intersect resulting lattices to obtain , with full implementations in Sage/MCLF and a dedicated module for superelliptic curves. The approach is demonstrated on explicit -adic examples, yielding explicit lattice bases such as for certain genus-2 cases and for higher genus, illustrating the practical impact for arithmetic applications like BSD verifications and differential-form computations on nonregular models.

Abstract

Given a superelliptic curve over a local field , we describe the theoretical background and an implementation of a new algorithm for computing the -lattice of integral differential forms on . We build on the results of Obus and the second author, which describe arbitrary regular models of the projective line using only valuations. One novelty of our approach is that we construct an -model of with only rational singularities, but which may not be regular.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 30 theorems, 141 equations, 1 figure, 2 tables, 3 algorithms)

This paper contains 22 sections, 30 theorems, 141 equations, 1 figure, 2 tables, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

A regular point $y\in Y$ is a rational singularity.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Different steps in Algorithm \ref{['alg:regular_model1']} with input $f = (x^2-5)^3 - 5^5$

Theorems & Definitions (89)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • proof
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Theorem 1.5
  • proof
  • Remark 1.6
  • Remark 1.7
  • Definition 2.1
  • Example 2.2
  • ...and 79 more