Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Enhanced nearby and vanishing cycles in dimension one and Fourier transform

Andrea D'Agnolo, Masaki Kashiwara

Abstract

Enhanced ind-sheaves provide a suitable framework for the irregular Riemann-Hilbert correspondence. In this paper, we give some precisions on nearby and vanishing cycles for enhanced perverse objects in dimension one. As an application, we give a topological proof of the following fact. Let $\mathcal M$ be a holonomic algebraic $\mathcal D$-module on the affine line, and denote by ${}^{\mathsf{L}}\mathcal M$ its Fourier-Laplace transform. For a point $a$ on the affine line, denote by $\ell_a$ the corresponding linear function on the dual affine line. Then, the vanishing cycles of $\mathcal M$ at $a$ are isomorphic to the graded component of degree $\ell_a$ of the Stokes filtration of ${}^{\mathsf{L}}\mathcal M$ at infinity.

Enhanced nearby and vanishing cycles in dimension one and Fourier transform

Abstract

Enhanced ind-sheaves provide a suitable framework for the irregular Riemann-Hilbert correspondence. In this paper, we give some precisions on nearby and vanishing cycles for enhanced perverse objects in dimension one. As an application, we give a topological proof of the following fact. Let be a holonomic algebraic -module on the affine line, and denote by its Fourier-Laplace transform. For a point on the affine line, denote by the corresponding linear function on the dual affine line. Then, the vanishing cycles of at are isomorphic to the graded component of degree of the Stokes filtration of at infinity.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 16 theorems, 91 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Proposition 3.2

Let $K\in\mathrm{E}^{\mathrm{b}}_{\mathbb{R}\text{-}\mathrm{c}}(\mathrm{I}\mspace{2mu}\mathbf{k}_{X})$ have normal form at $I\subset S_a X$. Then $\mathrm{E}\nu^\mathsf{rb}_{{\{{a}\}}}(K)|_I$ is of sheaf type. More precisely, $\mathrm{E}\nu^\mathsf{rb}_{{\{{a}\}}}(K)|_I\simeq e\iota(L)$ for $L\in\ma

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The sets $\overline{j(U)}$, $\overline{\widetilde{\jmath}(U)}$ and $\overline{\widehat{\jmath}(U)}$ pictured in the case $M=\mathbb{R}$ and $N={\{{0}\}}$. The red lines are fibers of the projection $p_U\colon U\xrightarrow{}\Omega\xrightarrow{}M$. (Color figure online.)

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Definition 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Definition 3.4
  • Lemma 3.5
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.6
  • Proposition 3.7
  • ...and 26 more