Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Tensions in the dark: shedding light on Dark Matter-Dark Energy interactions

Matteo Lucca, Deanna C. Hooper

TL;DR

This paper tests a DM–DE interacting model with a coupling Q^ν = ξ H ρ_x u^ν_c against a comprehensive set of cosmological data. Using CLASS and MontePython, the authors constrain a 6+1 parameter extension and assess model viability with Planck 2018, BAO, Pantheon, and SH0ES data, plus Bayesian evidence. They find that all data together reduce the H0 tension to about 2.5σ (H0 ≈ 69.8 km/s/Mpc) but yield no strong preference over ΛCDM; Planck+R19 alone favors the interaction, while BAO/Pantheon tilt toward ΛCDM, consistent with no-go results for late-time modifications. The work highlights that, despite partial tension relief, the data do not unequivocally support iDMDE as a solution.

Abstract

The emergence of an increasingly strong tension between the Hubble rate inferred from early- and late-time observations has reinvigorated interest in nonstandard scenarios, with the aim of reconciling these measurements. One such model involves interactions between Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Here we consider a specific form of the coupling between these two fluids proportional to the Dark Energy energy density, which has been studied extensively in the literature and claimed to substantially alleviate the Hubble tension. We complement the work already discussed in several previous analyses and show that, once all relevant cosmological probes are included simultaneously, the value of the Hubble parameter in this model is $H_0=69.82_{-0.76}^{+0.63}$ km/(s Mpc), which reduces the Hubble tension to $2.5σ$. Furthermore, we also perform a statistical model comparison, finding a $Δχ^2$ of $-2.15$ (corresponding to a significance of 1.5$σ$) with the inclusion of one additional free parameter, showing no clear preference for this model with respect to $Λ$CDM, which is further confirmed with an analysis of the Bayes ratio.

Tensions in the dark: shedding light on Dark Matter-Dark Energy interactions

TL;DR

This paper tests a DM–DE interacting model with a coupling Q^ν = ξ H ρ_x u^ν_c against a comprehensive set of cosmological data. Using CLASS and MontePython, the authors constrain a 6+1 parameter extension and assess model viability with Planck 2018, BAO, Pantheon, and SH0ES data, plus Bayesian evidence. They find that all data together reduce the H0 tension to about 2.5σ (H0 ≈ 69.8 km/s/Mpc) but yield no strong preference over ΛCDM; Planck+R19 alone favors the interaction, while BAO/Pantheon tilt toward ΛCDM, consistent with no-go results for late-time modifications. The work highlights that, despite partial tension relief, the data do not unequivocally support iDMDE as a solution.

Abstract

The emergence of an increasingly strong tension between the Hubble rate inferred from early- and late-time observations has reinvigorated interest in nonstandard scenarios, with the aim of reconciling these measurements. One such model involves interactions between Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Here we consider a specific form of the coupling between these two fluids proportional to the Dark Energy energy density, which has been studied extensively in the literature and claimed to substantially alleviate the Hubble tension. We complement the work already discussed in several previous analyses and show that, once all relevant cosmological probes are included simultaneously, the value of the Hubble parameter in this model is km/(s Mpc), which reduces the Hubble tension to . Furthermore, we also perform a statistical model comparison, finding a of (corresponding to a significance of 1.5) with the inclusion of one additional free parameter, showing no clear preference for this model with respect to CDM, which is further confirmed with an analysis of the Bayes ratio.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 10 equations, 2 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Two-dimensional contours (68% and 95% C.L.) of the ($\xi-H_0$) plane. The different colors denote different combinations of probes considered within this work: Planck (red), Planck+R19 (blue), and Planck+BAO+Pantheon (green). The yellow band corresponds to the R19 measurement.
  • Figure 2: Evolution of $H(z)$ for iDMDE, using the best-fit cosmological parameters from Table \ref{['tab:bestfits']} for Planck+R19 (blue), Planck+ BAO+Pantheon (green), and Planck+R19+BAO+ Pantheon (red). For comparison, the standard $\Lambda$CDM prediction is also shown in black. The shaded areas correspond to the 1$\sigma$ bounds. Additionally, the R19 data point is shown, as well as several low-redshift BAO measurements.