A simple symmetric exclusion process driven by an asymmetric tracer particle

Abstract

We consider an exclusion process on a periodic one-dimensional lattice where all particles perform simple symmetric exclusion at rate $1$ except for a single tracer particle, which performs partially simple asymmetric exclusion with rate $p$ to the right and rate $q$ to the left. This model was first considered by Ferrari, Goldstein and Lebowitz (Progr. Phys., 1985) as a test for the validity of the Einstein relation in microscopic systems. The main thrust of this work is an exact solution for the steady state of this exclusion process. We show that the stationary probabilities factorize and give an exact formula for the nonequilibrium partition function. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the nonequilibrium free energy in the steady state is not well-defined for this system in the thermodynamic limit for any values of $p$ and $q$ if $p \neq q$. We provide formulas for the current and two-point correlations. When the tracer particle performs asymmetric exclusion ($q=0$), the results are shown to simplify significantly and we find an unexpected connection with the combinatorics of set partitions. Finally, we study the system from the point of view of the tracer particle, the so-called environment process. In the environment process, we show that the density of particles decays exponentially with the scaled position in front of the tracer particle in the thermodynamic limit.

Figures (3)

• Figure 1: A plot of the ratio of the asymptotic to the exact formula for the restricted partition function with $n = 0.5 L$, $p=0.55$ and $q=0.78$ for even values of $L$ ranging from 12 to 120.
• Figure 2: A plot of the exact density of particles (red dots) ahead of the tracer particle in a system of size $L=75$ with $n=17$, $p=0.75$ and $q=0.4$, along with the expected curve from \ref{['dens-asymp']} (blue curve).
• Figure 3: A plot of $\rho G$ versus $\rho$ for small values of $\rho$.

Theorems & Definitions (30)

• Example 2.1
• Proposition 2.2
• Proposition 2.3
• Theorem 2.4
• Remark 2.5
• Corollary 2.6
• Theorem 2.7
• Theorem 2.8
• Theorem 2.9
• proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:ss']}