Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Comparing the Kirwan and noncommutative resolutions of quotient varieties

Špela Špenko, Michel Van den Bergh

TL;DR

The paper investigates how noncommutative crepant resolutions (NCCRs) of quotient varieties $X/\\!/G$ relate to Kirwan resolutions. It proves that $D(\\End_X({\mathcal U})^G)$ embeds into the derived category of the Kirwan resolution $D({\bf X}/G)$ and, under CM and generator in codimension-one conditions, promotes this embedding to a full semi-orthogonal decomposition with additional components given by endomorphism algebras on stabilized centers. For abelian $G$ explicit SODs decompose $D({\bf X}/G)$ into $D(\\Lambda)$ plus multiple copies of $D( Z_{ji}/(G/H_{ji}) )$, while in general these extra pieces are described by Azumaya algebras over smooth DM-stacks, revealing a gerby structure. The work combines Reichstein and Kirwan transforms with Luna slice methods to provide a robust, local-to-global framework for understanding NCCRs within the Kirwan resolution, including concrete linear-case analyses, generation results, and Morita-theoretic interpretations. Overall, the results bridge NCCRs with geometric resolutions, yielding explicit decompositions and Morita descriptions that illuminate the categorical landscape of quotient singularities and their resolutions.

Abstract

Let a reductive group $G$ act on a smooth variety $X$ such that a good quotient $X{/\!\!/}G$ exists. We show that the derived category of a noncommutative crepant resolution (NCCR) of $X{/\!\!/} G$, obtained from a $G$-equivariant vector bundle on $X$, can be embedded in the derived category of the (canonical, stacky) Kirwan resolution of $X{/\!\!/} G$. In fact the embedding can be completed to a semi-orthogonal decomposition in which the other parts are all derived categories of Azumaya algebras over smooth Deligne-Mumford stacks.

Comparing the Kirwan and noncommutative resolutions of quotient varieties

TL;DR

The paper investigates how noncommutative crepant resolutions (NCCRs) of quotient varieties relate to Kirwan resolutions. It proves that embeds into the derived category of the Kirwan resolution and, under CM and generator in codimension-one conditions, promotes this embedding to a full semi-orthogonal decomposition with additional components given by endomorphism algebras on stabilized centers. For abelian explicit SODs decompose into plus multiple copies of , while in general these extra pieces are described by Azumaya algebras over smooth DM-stacks, revealing a gerby structure. The work combines Reichstein and Kirwan transforms with Luna slice methods to provide a robust, local-to-global framework for understanding NCCRs within the Kirwan resolution, including concrete linear-case analyses, generation results, and Morita-theoretic interpretations. Overall, the results bridge NCCRs with geometric resolutions, yielding explicit decompositions and Morita descriptions that illuminate the categorical landscape of quotient singularities and their resolutions.

Abstract

Let a reductive group act on a smooth variety such that a good quotient exists. We show that the derived category of a noncommutative crepant resolution (NCCR) of , obtained from a -equivariant vector bundle on , can be embedded in the derived category of the (canonical, stacky) Kirwan resolution of . In fact the embedding can be completed to a semi-orthogonal decomposition in which the other parts are all derived categories of Azumaya algebras over smooth Deligne-Mumford stacks.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 43 sections, 56 theorems, 121 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.3

Let $G$ be a reductive group acting on a smooth variety $X$ such that a good quotient $\pi:X\to X/\!\!/ G$ exists. Assume H2. Let ${\bf X}/G$ be the Kirwan resolution of $X/\!\!/ G$ discussed above. Let ${\mathcal{U}}$ be a $G$-equivariant vector bundle on $X$ and assume that $\Lambda=\operatorname is fully faithful.

Theorems & Definitions (121)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Proposition 1.3: Proposition \ref{['prop:embedding']}
  • Proposition 1.4: Corollary 5.3, Lemma 5.4
  • Proposition 1.5: Corollary \ref{['cor:sod']}
  • Theorem 1.6: Theorem \ref{['thm:sod']}, Remark \ref{['rem:spoiler']}, Corollary \ref{['cor:external']}
  • Remark 4.1
  • Lemma 4.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 4.3
  • ...and 111 more