Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A post hoc test on the Sharpe ratio

Steven Pav

Abstract

We describe a post hoc test for the Sharpe ratio, analogous to Tukey's test for pairwise equality of means. The test can be applied after rejection of the hypothesis that all population Signal-Noise ratios are equal. The test is applicable under a simple correlation structure among asset returns. Simulations indicate the test maintains nominal type I rate under a wide range of conditions and is moderately powerful under reasonable alternatives.

A post hoc test on the Sharpe ratio

Abstract

We describe a post hoc test for the Sharpe ratio, analogous to Tukey's test for pairwise equality of means. The test can be applied after rejection of the hypothesis that all population Signal-Noise ratios are equal. The test is applicable under a simple correlation structure among asset returns. Simulations indicate the test maintains nominal type I rate under a wide range of conditions and is moderately powerful under reasonable alternatives.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 13 equations, 10 figures.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: The quantiles of the range of Sharpe ratio from 5,000 simulations are plotted against a transformed Tukey distribution, $\sqrt{(1-\rho)/{{n}_{}}\xspace}\, {q}^{}_{{\cdot},{{{k}_{}}\xspace},{\infty}}\xspace$. The points show little deviation from the plotted $y=x$ line.
  • Figure 2: The computed p-values from 5,000 simulations are plotted against a uniform law, visually confirming that the p-values are nearly uniform. Simulations use the exact $\rho$ to compute the p-values via ptukey. We transform the p-values and plot $\left| 2p - 1 \right|\xspace$ in log-log space to emphasize the tails. The points show little deviation from the plotted $y=x$ line.
  • Figure 3: The empirical type I rate at the nominal 0.05 level is plotted against the number of days in each simulation, for different values of ${{k}_{}}\xspace$. Simulations use the exact $\rho$ to perform the hypothesis test. The two facets show rejection rates under the $df={{n}_{}}\xspace-1$ and $df=\infty$ cutoffs. When using the $df=\infty$ cutoff, the test is anti-conservative for the "large ${{k}_{}}$, small ${{n}_{}}$" case, but the nominal rate is nearly achieved for the $df={{n}_{}}\xspace-1$ cutoff.
  • Figure 4: The empirical type I rate at the nominal 0.05 level is plotted against the correlation, $\rho$. Simulations use the exact $\rho$ to perform the hypothesis test, and the $df={{n}_{}}\xspace-1$ cutoff.
  • Figure 5: The empirical type I rate at the nominal 0.05 level is plotted against the correlation, $\rho$. Simulations use an estimated$\rho$ to perform the hypothesis test, and the $df={{n}_{}}\xspace-1$ cutoff.
  • ...and 5 more figures