Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On double-membership graphs of models of Anti-Foundation

Bea Adam-Day, John Howe, Rosario Mennuni

TL;DR

This work studies double-membership graphs derived from countable models of Anti-Foundation by examining the D-graph $M_1$ and the SD-graph $M_0$ associated to a model $M\vDash \mathsf{ZFA}$. It shows that connected components of $M_1$ align with unions of regions in $M$ and, in contrast, that without Foundation these graphs can realize essentially any graph, yielding a wealth of non-well-founded structures. The authors establish continuum-many non-isomorphic D-graphs and continuum-many countable models of each theory, using $n$-flowers and $A$-bouquets to encode local configurations and flat systems under $\mathsf{AFA}$ to realize them, and they prove that the common theory $\mathrm{Th}(K_1)$ is incomplete with completions characterized by consistent collections of consistency statements, all of which are model-theoretically wild. They further derive consequences such as the existence of countable models elementarily equivalent to a D-graph but not arising from any $\mathsf{ZFA}$-model, and a no-infinite-diameter result that yields SD-graphs not obtainable as D-graphs, providing negative answers to questions in earlier work on these graphs. Overall, the paper develops a robust model-theoretic picture of non-well-founded graph reducts, employing EF games, interpretability arguments, and finite-structure reasoning to map the landscape of completions and their complexity.

Abstract

We answer some questions about graphs which are reducts of countable models of Anti-Foundation, obtained by considering the binary relation of double-membership $x\in y\in x$. We show that there are continuum-many such graphs, and study their connected components. We describe their complete theories and prove that each has continuum-many countable models, some of which are not reducts of models of Anti-Foundation.

On double-membership graphs of models of Anti-Foundation

TL;DR

This work studies double-membership graphs derived from countable models of Anti-Foundation by examining the D-graph and the SD-graph associated to a model . It shows that connected components of align with unions of regions in and, in contrast, that without Foundation these graphs can realize essentially any graph, yielding a wealth of non-well-founded structures. The authors establish continuum-many non-isomorphic D-graphs and continuum-many countable models of each theory, using -flowers and -bouquets to encode local configurations and flat systems under to realize them, and they prove that the common theory is incomplete with completions characterized by consistent collections of consistency statements, all of which are model-theoretically wild. They further derive consequences such as the existence of countable models elementarily equivalent to a D-graph but not arising from any -model, and a no-infinite-diameter result that yields SD-graphs not obtainable as D-graphs, providing negative answers to questions in earlier work on these graphs. Overall, the paper develops a robust model-theoretic picture of non-well-founded graph reducts, employing EF games, interpretability arguments, and finite-structure reasoning to map the landscape of completions and their complexity.

Abstract

We answer some questions about graphs which are reducts of countable models of Anti-Foundation, obtained by considering the binary relation of double-membership . We show that there are continuum-many such graphs, and study their connected components. We describe their complete theories and prove that each has continuum-many countable models, some of which are not reducts of models of Anti-Foundation.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 19 theorems, 15 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

There are, up to isomorphism, continuum-many countable (single-)double-membership graphs of models of $\mathsf{ZFA}$, and continuum-many countable models of each of their theories.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: On the left, a picture of the unique sets $a$ and $b$ such that $a=\{b, \emptyset\}$ and $b=\{a,\{\emptyset\}\}$. On the right, a picture of the unique set $c$ such that $c=\{c,\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}$. The arrows denote membership.
  • Figure 2: The set $a=\{\{a,i\}\mid i<5\}$ is a $5$-flower. The reason for the name '$n$-flower' can be seen in this figure.

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Theorem : Corollary \ref{['co:manymodels']}
  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['thm:completions']}
  • Theorem : Corollary \ref{['co:q5']}
  • Definition 1.1
  • Example 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • proof
  • Definition 1.6
  • Definition 1.7
  • Definition 2.1
  • ...and 39 more