Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantitative OCT reconstructions for dispersive media

Peter Elbau, Leonidas Mindrinos, Leopold Veselka

TL;DR

This work develops a quantitative OCT framework for reconstructing the position, thickness, and optical properties of multi-layer dispersive media from time- and frequency-domain OCT data. It integrates an iterative layer-stripping approach with Maxwell-based forward models, handling non-dispersive, dispersive, and absorbing media, and uses phase retrieval strategies (including phase from multiple reference-mirror positions and Kramers-Kronig relations) to recover complex refractive indices. The contributions include explicit forward-model formulations, time-domain and frequency-domain inverse schemes, and numerical demonstrations showing accurate reconstructions and robustness to noise. The approach advances OCT by enabling quantitative, depth-resolved recovery of frequency-dependent optical properties, with potential applications in tissue diagnostics and material characterization.

Abstract

We consider the problem of reconstructing the position and the time-dependent optical properties of a linear dispersive medium from OCT measurements. The medium is multi-layered described by a piece-wise inhomogeneous refractive index. The measurement data are from a frequency-domain OCT system and we address also the phase retrieval problem. The parameter identification problem can be formulated as an one-dimensional inverse problem. Initially, we deal with a non-dispersive medium and we derive an iterative scheme that is the core of the algorithm for the frequency-dependent parameter. The case of absorbing medium is also addressed.

Quantitative OCT reconstructions for dispersive media

TL;DR

This work develops a quantitative OCT framework for reconstructing the position, thickness, and optical properties of multi-layer dispersive media from time- and frequency-domain OCT data. It integrates an iterative layer-stripping approach with Maxwell-based forward models, handling non-dispersive, dispersive, and absorbing media, and uses phase retrieval strategies (including phase from multiple reference-mirror positions and Kramers-Kronig relations) to recover complex refractive indices. The contributions include explicit forward-model formulations, time-domain and frequency-domain inverse schemes, and numerical demonstrations showing accurate reconstructions and robustness to noise. The approach advances OCT by enabling quantitative, depth-resolved recovery of frequency-dependent optical properties, with potential applications in tissue diagnostics and material characterization.

Abstract

We consider the problem of reconstructing the position and the time-dependent optical properties of a linear dispersive medium from OCT measurements. The medium is multi-layered described by a piece-wise inhomogeneous refractive index. The measurement data are from a frequency-domain OCT system and we address also the phase retrieval problem. The parameter identification problem can be formulated as an one-dimensional inverse problem. Initially, we deal with a non-dispersive medium and we derive an iterative scheme that is the core of the algorithm for the frequency-dependent parameter. The case of absorbing medium is also addressed.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 8 theorems, 100 equations, 8 figures, 3 tables, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Let $L = (z_1, \, z_2)$ be a single-layer medium, and let the refractive index be given by If the initial wave $f_0,$ see l1, satisfies $\mathop{\mathrm{supp}}\nolimits f_0\subset (-\infty,z_1),$ then the solution of l53, together with $u(t<0,z) = f_0,$ is given by with $U_1, \, U_2,$ and $U_3$ defined as before.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Experimental data obtained from a frequency-domain OCT system of a three-layer medium with piece-wise constant refractive index. Courtesy of Ryan Sentosa and Lisa Krainz, Medical University of Vienna.
  • Figure 2: Wave propagation. The reflection and transmission operators for the sub-problem \ref{['l2']} (left) and the sub-problem \ref{['l10']} (right).
  • Figure 3: Left: The intersection points of the circles $\hat{m} (r_1 ; \omega_1) \in \mathbbm{C}$ (red) and $\hat{m}_s (\omega_1) \in \mathbbm{C}$ (blue). Right: The intersection points of the circles $\hat{m} (r_1 ; \omega_2) \in \mathbbm{C}$ (red), $\hat{m} (r_2 ; \omega_2) \in \mathbbm{C}$ (green) and $\hat{m}_s (\omega_2) \in \mathbbm{C}$ (blue). The red asterisk indicates the unique solution. The setup is the same as the one in the third example in Sec. \ref{['sec4']}.
  • Figure 4: The simulated data (absolute value) in the time-domain for the first example (left) and in the frequency-domain for the second example (right).
  • Figure 5: The function $\phi(\omega),$ for $\omega \in [\underline{\omega},\overline{\omega}],$ at the first (left) and the last (right) iteration step of Algorithm \ref{['alg2']}.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proof 1
  • Example 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Proof 2
  • Remark 1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Proof 3
  • Proposition 4
  • ...and 7 more