Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The log-Sobolev inequality for spin systems of higher order interactions

Takis Konstantopoulos, Ioannis Papageorgiou

TL;DR

This work establishes a log-Sobolev inequality for infinite-dimensional Gibbs measures of spin systems on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ with higher-order interactions, assuming the single-site phase measure $\mu(dx)=\frac{e^{-\varphi(x)}dx}{\int e^{-\varphi(x)}dx}$ satisfies LS. The authors develop a framework based on coercive single-site inequalities and sweeping-out (conditioning) techniques to transfer LS from the one-site level to the full Gibbs measure, under small coupling, without requiring uniform LS on the site measures. They formulate a general setting with spin spaces modeled as nilpotent Lie groups (notably the Heisenberg group $\mathbb H_1$) and prove LS for the Gibbs measure in this context, yielding spectral-gap and concentration-type consequences. As a concrete application, they verify the hypotheses for a class of non-quadratic potentials on infinite products of Heisenberg groups, demonstrating exponential convergence to equilibrium for these high-order interaction spin systems. The results broaden the scope of LS-transport techniques to nonlinear, non-quadratic interactions and provide a concrete nontrivial class of models with guaranteed ergodic convergence properties.

Abstract

We study the infinite-dimensional log-Sobolev inequality for spin systems on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ with interactions of power higher than quadratic. We assume that the one site measure without a boundary $e^{-φ(x)}dx/Z$ satisfies a log-Sobolev inequality and we determine conditions so that the infinite-dimensional Gibbs measure also satisfies the inequality. As a concrete application, we prove that a certain class of nontrivial Gibbs measures with non-quadratic interaction potentials on an infinite product of Heisenberg groups satisfy the log-Sobolev inequality.

The log-Sobolev inequality for spin systems of higher order interactions

TL;DR

This work establishes a log-Sobolev inequality for infinite-dimensional Gibbs measures of spin systems on with higher-order interactions, assuming the single-site phase measure satisfies LS. The authors develop a framework based on coercive single-site inequalities and sweeping-out (conditioning) techniques to transfer LS from the one-site level to the full Gibbs measure, under small coupling, without requiring uniform LS on the site measures. They formulate a general setting with spin spaces modeled as nilpotent Lie groups (notably the Heisenberg group ) and prove LS for the Gibbs measure in this context, yielding spectral-gap and concentration-type consequences. As a concrete application, they verify the hypotheses for a class of non-quadratic potentials on infinite products of Heisenberg groups, demonstrating exponential convergence to equilibrium for these high-order interaction spin systems. The results broaden the scope of LS-transport techniques to nonlinear, non-quadratic interactions and provide a concrete nontrivial class of models with guaranteed ergodic convergence properties.

Abstract

We study the infinite-dimensional log-Sobolev inequality for spin systems on with interactions of power higher than quadratic. We assume that the one site measure without a boundary satisfies a log-Sobolev inequality and we determine conditions so that the infinite-dimensional Gibbs measure also satisfies the inequality. As a concrete application, we prove that a certain class of nontrivial Gibbs measures with non-quadratic interaction potentials on an infinite product of Heisenberg groups satisfy the log-Sobolev inequality.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 17 theorems, 165 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

Let $\nabla$ be the gradient and $\Delta$ be the sub-Laplacian on $\mathbb{H}_1$. Then $\|\nabla \bm d(x,e) \|=1$ for all $x=(x_1, x_2, x_3)\in\mathbb{H}$ such that $(x_1, x_2)\neq0$. Also there exists a positive constant $K$ such that $\Delta \bm d(x,e)<K/\bm d(x,e)$ in the sense of distributions.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: $\circ = \Gamma_0$, $\bullet = \Gamma_1$

Theorems & Definitions (28)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Corollary 2.2
  • Corollary 2.3
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • ...and 18 more