Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Gluing vertex algebras

Thomas Creutzig, Shashank Kanade, Robert McRae

TL;DR

This work builds a precise bridge between braided tensor category theory and vertex operator algebra extensions by proving that commutative algebra objects in braided Deligne products encode braid-reversed equivalences between module categories. It constructs the canonical commutative algebra $ extsf{A}=igoplus_{X} X' oxtimes X$ (and its VOA analogs) to glue two VOAs along their module categories, and shows how a braid-reversed equivalence yields a simple, conformal extension with fusion rules mirroring tensor-product decompositions. Conversely, given a simple commutative algebra in a Deligne product, one recovers a braid-reversed equivalence between the associated subcategories, providing a robust duality between algebras and categorical symmetries. The framework applies to VOAs, yielding new conformal extensions from Kazhdan–Lusztig categories and giving braid-reversed correspondences between affine VOAs and W-algebras at admissible levels, with implications for S-duality, cosets, and beyond. Overall, the paper develops a versatile, non-rigid-friendly toolkit for constructing and classifying VOA extensions via braided tensor category methods, enabling applications to geometric Langlands-type problems and beyond.

Abstract

We relate commutative algebras in braided tensor categories to braid-reversed tensor equivalences, motivated by vertex algebra representation theory. First, for $\mathcal{C}$ a braided tensor category, we give a detailed construction of the canonical algebra in $\mathcal{C}\boxtimes\mathcal{C}^\text{rev}$: if $\mathcal{C}$ is semisimple but not necessarily finite or rigid, then $\bigoplus_{X\in\text{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}X'\boxtimes X$ is a commutative algebra, with $X'$ a representing object for $\text{Hom}_\mathcal{C}(\bullet\otimes_\mathcal{C}X,\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}})$. Conversely, let $A=\bigoplus_{i\in I}U_i\boxtimes V_i$ be a simple commutative algebra in $\mathcal{U}\boxtimes\mathcal{V}$ with $\mathcal{U}$ semisimple and rigid but not necessarily finite, and $\mathcal{V}$ rigid but not necessarily semisimple. If the unit objects of $\mathcal{U}$ and $\mathcal{V}$ form a commuting pair in $A$, we show there is a braid-reversed equivalence between subcategories of $\mathcal{U}$ and $\mathcal{V}$ sending $U_i$ to $V_i^*$. When $\mathcal{U}$ and $\mathcal{V}$ are module categories for simple vertex operator algebras $U$ and $V$, we glue $U$ and $V$ along $\mathcal{U}\boxtimes\mathcal{V}$ via a map $τ:\text{Irr}(\mathcal{U})\rightarrow\text{Obj}(\mathcal{V})$ such that $τ(U)=V$ to create $A=\bigoplus_{X\in\text{Irr}(\mathcal{U})}X'\otimesτ(X)$. Thus under certain conditions, $τ$ extends to a braid-reversed equivalence between $\mathcal{U}$ and $\mathcal{V}$ if and only if $A$ is a simple conformal vertex algebra extending $U\otimes V$. As examples, we glue Kazhdan-Lusztig categories at generic levels to obtain new vertex algebras extending the tensor product of two affine vertex algebras, and we prove braid-reversed equivalences between certain module categories for affine vertex algebras and $W$-algebras at admissible levels.

Gluing vertex algebras

TL;DR

This work builds a precise bridge between braided tensor category theory and vertex operator algebra extensions by proving that commutative algebra objects in braided Deligne products encode braid-reversed equivalences between module categories. It constructs the canonical commutative algebra (and its VOA analogs) to glue two VOAs along their module categories, and shows how a braid-reversed equivalence yields a simple, conformal extension with fusion rules mirroring tensor-product decompositions. Conversely, given a simple commutative algebra in a Deligne product, one recovers a braid-reversed equivalence between the associated subcategories, providing a robust duality between algebras and categorical symmetries. The framework applies to VOAs, yielding new conformal extensions from Kazhdan–Lusztig categories and giving braid-reversed correspondences between affine VOAs and W-algebras at admissible levels, with implications for S-duality, cosets, and beyond. Overall, the paper develops a versatile, non-rigid-friendly toolkit for constructing and classifying VOA extensions via braided tensor category methods, enabling applications to geometric Langlands-type problems and beyond.

Abstract

We relate commutative algebras in braided tensor categories to braid-reversed tensor equivalences, motivated by vertex algebra representation theory. First, for a braided tensor category, we give a detailed construction of the canonical algebra in : if is semisimple but not necessarily finite or rigid, then is a commutative algebra, with a representing object for . Conversely, let be a simple commutative algebra in with semisimple and rigid but not necessarily finite, and rigid but not necessarily semisimple. If the unit objects of and form a commuting pair in , we show there is a braid-reversed equivalence between subcategories of and sending to . When and are module categories for simple vertex operator algebras and , we glue and along via a map such that to create . Thus under certain conditions, extends to a braid-reversed equivalence between and if and only if is a simple conformal vertex algebra extending . As examples, we glue Kazhdan-Lusztig categories at generic levels to obtain new vertex algebras extending the tensor product of two affine vertex algebras, and we prove braid-reversed equivalences between certain module categories for affine vertex algebras and -algebras at admissible levels.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 26 theorems, 236 equations.

Key Result

Corollary 1.1

In the setting of Main Theorem mthm:voa, assume in addition that $\mathcal{U}$ and $\mathcal{V}$ are strongly rational and ${\mathsf{A}}$ is a simple CFT-type ($\mathbb{Z}$-graded) vertex operator algebra. Then $\dim_\mathcal{C} {\mathsf{A}} >0$ and ${\mathsf{A}}$ is strongly rational; in particular

Theorems & Definitions (65)

  • Corollary 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Conjecture 1.3
  • Corollary 1.4
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • ...and 55 more