Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Computing the Lie algebra of the differential Galois group: the reducible case

Thomas Dreyfus, Jacques-Arthur Weil

Abstract

In this paper, we explain how to compute the Lie algebra of the differential Galois group of a reducible linear differential system. We achieve this by showing how to transform a block-triangular linear differential system into a Kolchin-Kovacic reduced form. We combine this with other reduction results to propose a general algorithm for computing a reduced form of a general linear differential system. In particular, this provides directly the Lie algebra of the differential Galois group without an a priori computation of this Galois group.

Computing the Lie algebra of the differential Galois group: the reducible case

Abstract

In this paper, we explain how to compute the Lie algebra of the differential Galois group of a reducible linear differential system. We achieve this by showing how to transform a block-triangular linear differential system into a Kolchin-Kovacic reduced form. We combine this with other reduction results to propose a general algorithm for computing a reduced form of a general linear differential system. In particular, this provides directly the Lie algebra of the differential Galois group without an a priori computation of this Galois group.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 30 sections, 18 theorems, 116 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 1.4

Let $\mathfrak{n}\subset \mathcal{M}_n\left(\mathcal{C}\right)$ be a $\mathcal{C}$-vector space of lower triangular matrices with zero entries on the diagonal. Assume that, for all $N,N'\in \mathfrak{n}$, $N\cdot N'=(0)$. Then, ${U:=\{{\mathrm{Id}}_n+N, N\in \mathfrak{n}\}}$ is a connected algebrai

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: The isotypical flag of the nilpotent example.
  • Figure 2: The action of the adjoint map on the isotypical flag of the nilpotent example $\S \ref{['nilpotent-example-continued']}$. The spaces $W_1$ (left), $W_2$ (center) and $W_3$ (right) satisfy $\mathfrak{gl}_{\mathrm{sub}}=W_1\oplus W_2 \oplus W_3$. The red rectangles correspond to the part that we get rid of via the reduction matrix, and the blue rectangles correspond to what will remain in the reduced matrix.

Theorems & Definitions (57)

  • Remark 1.1
  • Example 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Lemma 1.4
  • proof
  • Definition 1.5
  • Definition 1.6
  • Proposition 1.7: Kolchin-Kovacic reduction theorem
  • Definition 1.8
  • Remark 1.9
  • ...and 47 more