Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Reconstruction of a Local Perturbation in Inhomogeneous Periodic Layers from Partial Near Field Measurements

Alexander Konschin, Armin Lechleiter

TL;DR

The paper addresses reconstructing a local perturbation of a given inhomogeneous periodic layer from near-field measurements by reformulating the unbounded scattering problem via the Bloch-Floquet transform into a family of bounded, quasi-periodic problems. It develops a rigorous direct problem framework with a variational formulation and a Dirichlet-to-Neumann boundary operator, and establishes existence and uniqueness under absorption. For the inverse problem, it defines measurement operators, proves injectivity, analyzes Fréchet differentiability, and characterizes ill-posedness through the tangential cone condition. The authors implement a numerical scheme based on a Bloch-transform discretization and an inexact Newton method (CG-REGINN) to reconstruct the perturbation, validating the approach with 2D and 3D numerical examples and demonstrating feasibility for non-destructive testing in micro/nano-structured materials. The work combines analytic Fredholm theory, CGO-based uniqueness arguments, and advanced numerical techniques to provide a comprehensive framework for direct and inverse scattering in locally perturbed periodic layers.

Abstract

We consider the inverse scattering problem to reconstruct a local perturbation of a given inhomogeneous periodic layer in $\mathbb{R}^d$, $d=2,3$, using near field measurements of the scattered wave on an open set of the boundary above the medium, or, the measurements of the full wave in some area. The appearance of the perturbation prevents the reduction of the problem to one periodic cell, such that classical methods are not applicable and the problem becomes more challenging. We first show the equivalence of the direct scattering problem, modeled by the Helmholtz equation formulated on an unbounded domain, to a family of quasi-periodic problems on a bounded domain, for which we can apply some classical results to provide unique existence of the solution to the scattering problem. The reformulation of the problem is also the key idea for the numerical algorithm to approximate the solution, which we will describe in more detail. Moreover, we characterize the smoothness of the Bloch-Floquet transformed solution of the perturbed problem w.r.t. the quasi-periodicity to improve the convergence rate of the numerical approximation. Afterward, we define two measurement operators, which map the perturbation to some measurement data, and show uniqueness results for the inverse problems, and the ill-posedness of these. Finally, we provide numerical examples for the direct problem solver as well as examples of the reconstruction in 2D and 3D.

Reconstruction of a Local Perturbation in Inhomogeneous Periodic Layers from Partial Near Field Measurements

TL;DR

The paper addresses reconstructing a local perturbation of a given inhomogeneous periodic layer from near-field measurements by reformulating the unbounded scattering problem via the Bloch-Floquet transform into a family of bounded, quasi-periodic problems. It develops a rigorous direct problem framework with a variational formulation and a Dirichlet-to-Neumann boundary operator, and establishes existence and uniqueness under absorption. For the inverse problem, it defines measurement operators, proves injectivity, analyzes Fréchet differentiability, and characterizes ill-posedness through the tangential cone condition. The authors implement a numerical scheme based on a Bloch-transform discretization and an inexact Newton method (CG-REGINN) to reconstruct the perturbation, validating the approach with 2D and 3D numerical examples and demonstrating feasibility for non-destructive testing in micro/nano-structured materials. The work combines analytic Fredholm theory, CGO-based uniqueness arguments, and advanced numerical techniques to provide a comprehensive framework for direct and inverse scattering in locally perturbed periodic layers.

Abstract

We consider the inverse scattering problem to reconstruct a local perturbation of a given inhomogeneous periodic layer in , , using near field measurements of the scattered wave on an open set of the boundary above the medium, or, the measurements of the full wave in some area. The appearance of the perturbation prevents the reduction of the problem to one periodic cell, such that classical methods are not applicable and the problem becomes more challenging. We first show the equivalence of the direct scattering problem, modeled by the Helmholtz equation formulated on an unbounded domain, to a family of quasi-periodic problems on a bounded domain, for which we can apply some classical results to provide unique existence of the solution to the scattering problem. The reformulation of the problem is also the key idea for the numerical algorithm to approximate the solution, which we will describe in more detail. Moreover, we characterize the smoothness of the Bloch-Floquet transformed solution of the perturbed problem w.r.t. the quasi-periodicity to improve the convergence rate of the numerical approximation. Afterward, we define two measurement operators, which map the perturbation to some measurement data, and show uniqueness results for the inverse problems, and the ill-posedness of these. Finally, we provide numerical examples for the direct problem solver as well as examples of the reconstruction in 2D and 3D.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 16 theorems, 103 equations, 4 figures, 5 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1

If the assumption_absorption holds, the variational problem prob_Var1 has a unique solution.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Example for the refractive index $n^2 = n^2_p + q$.
  • Figure 2: The refractive index and the perturbation for all 2D examples.
  • Figure 3: Reconstruction for both measurement operators $\widetilde{\Lambda}$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{S}}$ ($d=2$).
  • Figure 4: Reconstruction for $d=3$.

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Corollary 5
  • proof
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • ...and 22 more