Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Grothendieck ring of varieties in positive characteristic

Kirti Joshi

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether the Grothendieck ring of varieties in positive characteristic is a domain by working with the smooth-complete variant ${\rm K}^0_{\rm bl}(\mathcal{CV}^{sm}_k)$. It constructs two motivic measures: the Albanese motivic measure ${\rm Alb}:{\rm K}^0_{\rm bl}(\mathcal{CV}^{sm}_k)\to {\mathbb Z}[AV_k]$ and proves, in characteristic $p>0$ with $p>13$ or $p=11$, that the class of a supersingular elliptic curve is a zero divisor via Deligne’s isomorphisms; this shows ${\rm K}^0_{\rm bl}(\mathcal{CV}^{sm}_k)$ contains zero divisors. It also establishes that the étale fundamental group defines a motivic measure ${\Pi}:{\rm K}^0_{\rm bl}(\mathcal{CV}^{sm}_k)\to {\mathbb Z}[\mathscr{Prof}]$, extending to ${\rm K}^0(\mathcal{V}_k)$ in characteristic zero, and verifies the required compatibility with Bittner relations under blowups and products. Together, these results connect arithmetic-geometric invariants with motivic measures and demonstrate non-domain structure in positive characteristic, while providing tools that transfer to the classical Grothendieck ring in characteristic zero.

Abstract

This paper proves two theorems (1) Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p>0$. I prove (Theorem 2.1.1) that if, $p > 13$ or $p = 11$, then the isomorphism class of any supersingular elliptic curve is a zero divisor in the ring of smooth, complete $k$-varieties and Bittner relations. In particular, this ring contains zero divisors. The proof proceeds via establishing (in Theorem 2.2.1) that the Albanese variety functor is a motivic measure. (2) I prove (Theorem 3.1) that the etale fundamental group of a smooth, proper variety over any alg. clsoed field k (in any characteristic) also provides a motivic measure on this ring. In particular, the etale fundamental group is a motivic measure on the Grothendieck ring of varieties over complex numbers.

On the Grothendieck ring of varieties in positive characteristic

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether the Grothendieck ring of varieties in positive characteristic is a domain by working with the smooth-complete variant . It constructs two motivic measures: the Albanese motivic measure and proves, in characteristic with or , that the class of a supersingular elliptic curve is a zero divisor via Deligne’s isomorphisms; this shows contains zero divisors. It also establishes that the étale fundamental group defines a motivic measure , extending to in characteristic zero, and verifies the required compatibility with Bittner relations under blowups and products. Together, these results connect arithmetic-geometric invariants with motivic measures and demonstrate non-domain structure in positive characteristic, while providing tools that transfer to the classical Grothendieck ring in characteristic zero.

Abstract

This paper proves two theorems (1) Let be an algebraically closed field of characteristic . I prove (Theorem 2.1.1) that if, or , then the isomorphism class of any supersingular elliptic curve is a zero divisor in the ring of smooth, complete -varieties and Bittner relations. In particular, this ring contains zero divisors. The proof proceeds via establishing (in Theorem 2.2.1) that the Albanese variety functor is a motivic measure. (2) I prove (Theorem 3.1) that the etale fundamental group of a smooth, proper variety over any alg. clsoed field k (in any characteristic) also provides a motivic measure on this ring. In particular, the etale fundamental group is a motivic measure on the Grothendieck ring of varieties over complex numbers.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 6 theorems, 19 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Then there is a natural isomorphism given by sending $[X]\longmapsto [X]$.

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 2.1.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.1.5
  • Theorem 2.2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2.3
  • proof
  • ...and 3 more