Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cluster categories and rational curves

Zheng Hua, Bernhard Keller

Abstract

We study rational curves on smooth complex Calabi--Yau threefolds via noncommutative algebra. By the general theory of derived noncommutative deformations due to Efimov, Lunts and Orlov, the structure sheaf of a rational curve in a smooth CY 3-fold $Y$ is pro-represented by a nonpositively graded dg algebra $Γ$. The curve is called nc rigid if $H^0Γ$ is finite dimensional. When $C$ is contractible, $H^0Γ$ is isomorphic to the contraction algebra defined by Donovan and Wemyss. More generally, one can show that there exists a $Γ$ pro-representing the (derived) multi-pointed deformation (defined by Kawamata) of a collection of rational curves $C_1,\ldots,C_t$ so that ${\mathrm{dim}}({\rm{Hom}}_Y({\mathcal{O}}_{C_i},{\mathcal{O}}_{C_j}))=δ_{ij}$. The collection is called nc rigid if $H^0Γ$ is finite dimensional. We prove that $Γ$ is a homologically smooth bimodule 3CY algebra. As a consequence, we define a (2CY) cluster category ${\mathcal{C}}_Γ$ for such a collection of rational curves in $Y$. It has finite-dimensional morphism spaces iff the collection is nc rigid. When $\bigcup_{i=1}^tC_i$ is (formally) contractible by a morphism $\hat{Y}\to \hat{X}$, ${\mathcal{C}}_Γ$ is equivalent to the singularity category of $\hat{X}$ and thus categorifies the contraction algebra of Donovan and Wemyss. The Calabi-Yau structure on $Y$ determines a canonical class $[w]$ (defined up to right equivalence) in the zeroth Hochschild homology of $H^0Γ$. Using our previous work on the noncommutative Mather--Yau theorem and singular Hochschild cohomology, we prove that the singularities underlying a 3-dimensional smooth flopping contraction are classified by the derived equivalence class of the pair $(H^0Γ, [w])$. We also give a new necessary condition for contractibility of rational curves in terms of $Γ$.

Cluster categories and rational curves

Abstract

We study rational curves on smooth complex Calabi--Yau threefolds via noncommutative algebra. By the general theory of derived noncommutative deformations due to Efimov, Lunts and Orlov, the structure sheaf of a rational curve in a smooth CY 3-fold is pro-represented by a nonpositively graded dg algebra . The curve is called nc rigid if is finite dimensional. When is contractible, is isomorphic to the contraction algebra defined by Donovan and Wemyss. More generally, one can show that there exists a pro-representing the (derived) multi-pointed deformation (defined by Kawamata) of a collection of rational curves so that . The collection is called nc rigid if is finite dimensional. We prove that is a homologically smooth bimodule 3CY algebra. As a consequence, we define a (2CY) cluster category for such a collection of rational curves in . It has finite-dimensional morphism spaces iff the collection is nc rigid. When is (formally) contractible by a morphism , is equivalent to the singularity category of and thus categorifies the contraction algebra of Donovan and Wemyss. The Calabi-Yau structure on determines a canonical class (defined up to right equivalence) in the zeroth Hochschild homology of . Using our previous work on the noncommutative Mather--Yau theorem and singular Hochschild cohomology, we prove that the singularities underlying a 3-dimensional smooth flopping contraction are classified by the derived equivalence class of the pair . We also give a new necessary condition for contractibility of rational curves in terms of .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 32 sections, 56 theorems, 158 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

(Corollary GaCY) Let $C_1,\ldots,C_t$ be a collection of rational curves in a smooth quasi-projective Calabi-Yau 3-fold $Y$ such that $\{{\mathcal{O}}_{C_i}\}_{i=1}^t$ form a semi-simple collection. The derived deformation algebra ${\Gamma}$ of $\bigoplus_{i=1}^t{\mathcal{O}}_{C_i}$ is a non positiv Moreover, ${\Gamma}$ is exact 3CY in either one of the following cases

Theorems & Definitions (120)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Corollary 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.6
  • ...and 110 more