Lessons from Natural Language Inference in the Clinical Domain
Alexey Romanov, Chaitanya Shivade
TL;DR
The paper tackles the limited generalization of NLP models in the data-scarce clinical domain by introducing MedNLI, a clinician-annotated natural language inference dataset grounded in patient histories. It systematically evaluates open-domain transfer learning and domain-knowledge integration via medical ontologies, demonstrating that domain-specific embeddings and transfer learning yield consistent gains, while retrofit-based approaches can hurt performance. The work provides thorough baselines (feature-based, BOW, InferSent, ESIM), analyzes transfer settings and embeddings, and introduces knowledge-directed attention as a viable integration technique, complemented by a frank error analysis and discussion of limitations. By releasing MedNLI and accompanying code, the authors aim to accelerate clinical NLP and NLI research and its practical applications, such as trial eligibility and guideline compliance monitoring.
Abstract
State of the art models using deep neural networks have become very good in learning an accurate mapping from inputs to outputs. However, they still lack generalization capabilities in conditions that differ from the ones encountered during training. This is even more challenging in specialized, and knowledge intensive domains, where training data is limited. To address this gap, we introduce MedNLI - a dataset annotated by doctors, performing a natural language inference task (NLI), grounded in the medical history of patients. We present strategies to: 1) leverage transfer learning using datasets from the open domain, (e.g. SNLI) and 2) incorporate domain knowledge from external data and lexical sources (e.g. medical terminologies). Our results demonstrate performance gains using both strategies.
