Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An Analytical Method for the NLO QCD Corrections to Double-Higgs Production

Roberto Bonciani, Giuseppe Degrassi, Pier Paolo Giardino, Ramona Gröber

TL;DR

The paper tackles the analytic computation of NLO QCD corrections to Higgs pair production in gluon fusion, where prior results were primarily numerical or based on heavy-mass expansions. It introduces a small-$p_T$ expansion of the amplitude that converts a multi-scale problem into a single-scale one, enabling analytic evaluation of virtual corrections. The results show accurate LO descriptions for $\sqrt{\hat{s}} \lesssim 750$ GeV (about 95% of hadronic cross section) and NLO agreement at $\mathcal{O}(p_T^2+m_h^2)$, with substantial CPU-time savings. The work offers a practical, generalizable framework for analytical higher-order corrections in $2\to 2$ processes and can be extended to other channels such as $HZ$, $ZZ$, and $\gamma\gamma$ gluon fusion.

Abstract

We propose a new method to calculate analytically higher-order perturbative corrections and we apply it to the calculation of the two-loop virtual corrections to Higgs pair production through gluon fusion. The method is based on the expansion of the amplitudes in terms of a small Higgs transverse momentum. This approach gives a very good approximation (better than per-mille) of the partonic cross section in the center of mass energy region $\sqrt{\hat{s}} \lesssim 750$ GeV, where $\sim95\%$ of the total hadronic cross section is concentrated. The presented method is general and can be applied in a straightforward way to the computation of virtual higher-order corrections to other $2\to2$ processes, representing an improvement with respect to calculations based on heavy mass expansions.

An Analytical Method for the NLO QCD Corrections to Double-Higgs Production

TL;DR

The paper tackles the analytic computation of NLO QCD corrections to Higgs pair production in gluon fusion, where prior results were primarily numerical or based on heavy-mass expansions. It introduces a small- expansion of the amplitude that converts a multi-scale problem into a single-scale one, enabling analytic evaluation of virtual corrections. The results show accurate LO descriptions for GeV (about 95% of hadronic cross section) and NLO agreement at , with substantial CPU-time savings. The work offers a practical, generalizable framework for analytical higher-order corrections in processes and can be extended to other channels such as , , and gluon fusion.

Abstract

We propose a new method to calculate analytically higher-order perturbative corrections and we apply it to the calculation of the two-loop virtual corrections to Higgs pair production through gluon fusion. The method is based on the expansion of the amplitudes in terms of a small Higgs transverse momentum. This approach gives a very good approximation (better than per-mille) of the partonic cross section in the center of mass energy region GeV, where of the total hadronic cross section is concentrated. The presented method is general and can be applied in a straightforward way to the computation of virtual higher-order corrections to other processes, representing an improvement with respect to calculations based on heavy mass expansions.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 16 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Partonic cross section of $gg\to HH$ as a function of the partonic center of mass energy. The black continuous line is the full result Glover:1987nx. The dotted lines represent two orders of approximation in the heavy $m_t$ limit. The dashed lines are the result of the small $p_{ T}^2$ approximation presented in this letter.
  • Figure 2: Finite part of the virtual corrections as a function of the invariant mass of the two Higgs system. The pink points are extracted with the interpolation function from Heinrich:2017kxx. The dotted light blue points correspond to reweighted HEFT Dawson:1998py. The solid lines are the respective orders in our calculation. We do not show $\mathcal{O}((p_T^2+m_h^2)^3)$ as the line lies perfectly on top of the one of $\mathcal{O}((p_T^2+m_h^2)^2)$.