Covert Transmission with a Self-sustained Relay

TL;DR

The minimum detection error probability is derived and the cost of achieving the maximum effective covert rate in both the time switching and power splitting schemes is the same, although the values of the values can be different in specific scenarios.

Abstract

This work examines the possibility, performance limits, and associated costs for a self-sustained relay to transmit its own covert information to a destination on top of forwarding the source's information. Since the source provides energy to the relay for forwarding its information, the source does not allow the relay's covert transmission and is to detect it. Considering the time switching (TS) and power splitting (PS) schemes for energy harvesting, where all the harvested energy is used for transmission at the self-sustained relay, we derive the minimum detection error probability $ξ^{\ast}$ at the source, based on which we determine the maximum effective covert rate $Ψ^{\ast}$ subject to a given covertness constraint on $ξ^{\ast}$. Our analysis shows that $ξ^{\ast}$ is the same for the TS and PS schemes, which leads to the fact that the cost of achieving $Ψ^{\ast}$ in both the two schemes in terms of the required increase in the energy conversion efficiency at the relay is the same, although the values of $Ψ^{\ast}$ in these two schemes can be different in specific scenarios. For example, the TS scheme outperforms the PS scheme in terms of achieving a higher $Ψ^{\ast}$ when the transmit power at the source is relatively low. If the covertness constraint is tighter than a specific value, it is the covertness constraint that limits $Ψ^{\ast}$, and otherwise it is upper bound on the energy conversion efficiency that limits $Ψ^{\ast}$.

Figures (6)

• Figure 1: Covert communications with a wireless-powered relay.
• Figure 2: The detection error probability $\xi$ versus $\tau$, where $\eta_0=0.4$, $\eta_1=0.7$, and $P_a=20$ dBm.
• Figure 3: The effective covert rate $\Psi$ versus Alice's transmit power $P_a$ with different values of $\eta_0$, where $\epsilon=0.1$.
• Figure 4: The maximum effective covert rate $\Psi^{\ast}$ versus $\eta_0$ with different values of $\epsilon$, where $P_a=20$ dBm.
• Figure 5: System overhead $\varphi$ versus $\eta_0$ under different values of $\epsilon$.

Theorems & Definitions (16)

• Lemma 1
• Theorem 1
• Theorem 2
• Corollary 1
• Remark 1
• Remark 2
• Corollary 2
• Theorem 3
• Remark 3
• Remark 4