Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Goldman-Turaev Lie bialgebra and the Kashiwara-Vergne problem in higher genera

Anton Alekseev, Nariya Kawazumi, Yusuke Kuno, Florian Naef

TL;DR

The work develops a higher-genus GT formality framework by tying the Goldman–Turaev Lie bialgebra structure on surfaces with boundary to a generalized Kashiwara–Vergne problem. It shows that solving the KV problem for a surface with framing generates a GT formality map, with genus-zero cases linked to associators and higher-genus cases reducible to key genus-zero and elliptic-genus one instances (via elliptic associators). The authors construct pro-unipotent groups KV and KRV acting freely and transitively on KV solution spaces and relate GT formality to Grothendieck–Teichmüller structures, while applications include a Johnson obstruction equality with the Enomoto–Satoh trace and a non-commutative divergence cocycle uniqueness result. Overall, the paper provides a rigorous bridge between topological surface invariants and non-commutative algebraic formality, with broad implications for mapping class groups and Johnson-type filtrations.

Abstract

For a compact oriented surface $Σ$ of genus $g$ with $n+1$ boundary components, the space $\mathfrak{g}(Σ)$ spanned by free homotopy classes of loops in $Σ$ carries the structure of a Lie bialgebra equipped with a natural decreasing filtration, whose structure morphisms are called the Goldman bracket and the (framed) Turaev cobracket. We address the following Goldman-Turaev (GT) formality problem: construct a Lie bialgebra homomorphism $θ$ from $\mathfrak{g}(Σ)$ to its associated graded ${\rm gr}\, \mathfrak{g}(Σ)$ such that ${\rm gr} \, θ= {\rm id}$. In order to solve it, we define a family of higher genus Kashiwara-Vergne (KV) problems for an element $F\in {\rm Aut}(L)$, where $L$ is a free Lie algebra. In the case of $g=0$ and $n=2$, it is the classical KV problem from Lie theory. For $g>0$, these KV problems are new. We show that an element $F$ induces a GT formality map if and only if it is a solution of the KV problem. A crucial step in solving the higher genus KV problem is to construct solutions for the case of $g=1$ and $n=1$ in terms of certain elliptic associators following Enriquez. By solving the KV problem, we establish the GT formality for every $g$ and $n$, with the exception of some framings for $g=1$ in which case the GT formality actually does not hold. Furthermore, we introduce pro-unipotent groups ${\rm KV}$ and ${\rm KRV}$ which act on the space of solutions of the KV problem freely and transitively. There are injective maps ${\rm GT}_1\to {\rm KV}, {\rm GRT}_1\to {\rm KRV}$ from Grothendieck-Teichmüller groups. As an application, we show that the Johnson obstruction given by the Turaev cobracket coincides with the one given by the Enomoto-Satoh trace. As part of our study, we prove a uniqueness theorem for non-commutative divergence cocycles on the group algebra of a free group which is of independent value.

The Goldman-Turaev Lie bialgebra and the Kashiwara-Vergne problem in higher genera

TL;DR

The work develops a higher-genus GT formality framework by tying the Goldman–Turaev Lie bialgebra structure on surfaces with boundary to a generalized Kashiwara–Vergne problem. It shows that solving the KV problem for a surface with framing generates a GT formality map, with genus-zero cases linked to associators and higher-genus cases reducible to key genus-zero and elliptic-genus one instances (via elliptic associators). The authors construct pro-unipotent groups KV and KRV acting freely and transitively on KV solution spaces and relate GT formality to Grothendieck–Teichmüller structures, while applications include a Johnson obstruction equality with the Enomoto–Satoh trace and a non-commutative divergence cocycle uniqueness result. Overall, the paper provides a rigorous bridge between topological surface invariants and non-commutative algebraic formality, with broad implications for mapping class groups and Johnson-type filtrations.

Abstract

For a compact oriented surface of genus with boundary components, the space spanned by free homotopy classes of loops in carries the structure of a Lie bialgebra equipped with a natural decreasing filtration, whose structure morphisms are called the Goldman bracket and the (framed) Turaev cobracket. We address the following Goldman-Turaev (GT) formality problem: construct a Lie bialgebra homomorphism from to its associated graded such that . In order to solve it, we define a family of higher genus Kashiwara-Vergne (KV) problems for an element , where is a free Lie algebra. In the case of and , it is the classical KV problem from Lie theory. For , these KV problems are new. We show that an element induces a GT formality map if and only if it is a solution of the KV problem. A crucial step in solving the higher genus KV problem is to construct solutions for the case of and in terms of certain elliptic associators following Enriquez. By solving the KV problem, we establish the GT formality for every and , with the exception of some framings for in which case the GT formality actually does not hold. Furthermore, we introduce pro-unipotent groups and which act on the space of solutions of the KV problem freely and transitively. There are injective maps from Grothendieck-Teichmüller groups. As an application, we show that the Johnson obstruction given by the Turaev cobracket coincides with the one given by the Enomoto-Satoh trace. As part of our study, we prove a uniqueness theorem for non-commutative divergence cocycles on the group algebra of a free group which is of independent value.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 68 sections, 150 theorems, 723 equations, 16 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $F \in {\rm Aut}^+(L)$ be such that for each $j \in \{1,\ldots,n \}$ there exists a group-like element $f_j \in A$ satisfying $F(z_j) = {f_j}^{-1}z_j f_j$, and Then, the map $\theta_F$ solves the formality problem for the Goldman Lie algebra of the surface of genus $g$ with $n+1$ boundary components.

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: The Goldman bracket and Turaev cobracket.
  • Figure 2: The Goldman bracket.
  • Figure 3: The operation $\kappa$
  • Figure 4: Inserting monogons
  • Figure 5: Splitting $\alpha$ at a self-intersection
  • ...and 11 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (376)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Definition 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Remark 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Definition 1.10
  • ...and 366 more