Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum Büchi Automata

Qisheng Wang, Mingsheng Ying

TL;DR

This work defines and analyzes quantum Büchi automata (QBAs) for infinite words, extending measure-once quantum finite automata (MO-QFAs) to capture long-term quantum behavior with Büchi-like acceptance. It formalizes the acceptance function f_A^{QBA}(w) and studies four threshold semantics, showing that only four ω-language classes—$\\mathbb{L}_{>0}(QBA)$, $\mathbb{L}_{>\lambda}(QBA)$, $\mathbb{L}_{=1}(QBA)$, and $\mathbb{L}_{\geq \lambda}(QBA)$—are substantially distinct, with precise inclusion and non-inclusion relations. The paper proves pumping lemmas, establishes closure properties (e.g., union closure, but not intersection or complementation under certain thresholds), and demonstrates decidability of emptiness and intersection emptiness across semantics. It also clarifies the relationship with classical ω-languages, showing QBAs can recognize languages beyond ω-regular and even ω-context-free, while some classical ω-languages remain unrecognizable by QBAs under the studied semantics. Overall, QBAs provide a rigorous quantum framework for modeling long-run quantum behavior, with implications for quantum model checking and verification, and open avenues for minimization and equivalence results.

Abstract

Quantum finite automata (QFAs) have been extensively studied in the literature. In this paper, we define and systematically study quantum Büchi automata (QBAs) over infinite words to model the long-term behavior of quantum systems, which extend QFAs. We introduce the classes of $ω$-languages recognized by QBAs in probable, almost sure, strict and non-strict threshold semantics. Several pumping lemmas and closure properties for QBAs are proved. Some decision problems for QBAs are investigated. In particular, we show that there are surprisingly only at most four substantially different classes of $ω$-languages recognized by QBAs (out of uncountably infinite). The relationship between classical $ω$-languages and QBAs is clarified using our pumping lemmas. We also find an $ω$-language recognized by QBAs under the almost sure semantics, which is not $ω$-context-free.

Quantum Büchi Automata

TL;DR

This work defines and analyzes quantum Büchi automata (QBAs) for infinite words, extending measure-once quantum finite automata (MO-QFAs) to capture long-term quantum behavior with Büchi-like acceptance. It formalizes the acceptance function f_A^{QBA}(w) and studies four threshold semantics, showing that only four ω-language classes—, , , and —are substantially distinct, with precise inclusion and non-inclusion relations. The paper proves pumping lemmas, establishes closure properties (e.g., union closure, but not intersection or complementation under certain thresholds), and demonstrates decidability of emptiness and intersection emptiness across semantics. It also clarifies the relationship with classical ω-languages, showing QBAs can recognize languages beyond ω-regular and even ω-context-free, while some classical ω-languages remain unrecognizable by QBAs under the studied semantics. Overall, QBAs provide a rigorous quantum framework for modeling long-run quantum behavior, with implications for quantum model checking and verification, and open avenues for minimization and equivalence results.

Abstract

Quantum finite automata (QFAs) have been extensively studied in the literature. In this paper, we define and systematically study quantum Büchi automata (QBAs) over infinite words to model the long-term behavior of quantum systems, which extend QFAs. We introduce the classes of -languages recognized by QBAs in probable, almost sure, strict and non-strict threshold semantics. Several pumping lemmas and closure properties for QBAs are proved. Some decision problems for QBAs are investigated. In particular, we show that there are surprisingly only at most four substantially different classes of -languages recognized by QBAs (out of uncountably infinite). The relationship between classical -languages and QBAs is clarified using our pumping lemmas. We also find an -language recognized by QBAs under the almost sure semantics, which is not -context-free.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 48 sections, 28 theorems, 89 equations, 1 figure, 2 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 3.1

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a QBA. For every $\omega$-word $w \in \Sigma^\omega$, we have

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Expressiveness of QBAs under different semantics.

Theorems & Definitions (77)

  • Definition 2.1: Finite automaton HMU06
  • Definition 2.2: Quantum finite automaton MC00
  • Definition 3.1: Quantum Büchi acceptance condition
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Example 1
  • Definition 3.2: Quantum Büchi acceptance condition in RKMS+13
  • Example 2
  • Remark 3.1: A brief comparison with probabilistic Büchi automata
  • Definition 3.3
  • Example 3
  • ...and 67 more