Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Nonexistence of generalized bent functions and the quadratic norm form equations

Chang Lv, Yuqing Zhu

TL;DR

This work proves broad nonexistence results for generalized bent functions of type $[n,2p^e]$ by translating the problem into the nonexistence of integral points on quadratic norm form equations over cyclotomic subfields. The authors establish a general criterion: if $E$ is a complex subfield of a cyclotomic field and $F=E\cap\mathbb R$, then for primes $p>(4q^n)^k$ the norm equation $N_{E/F}(\alpha)=q^n$ has no solution in $\mathfrak o_E$, with a descent mechanism to smaller fields underpinning the proof. Applying this to GBFs with $t=2p^e$ yields a universal nonexistence when $p$ is sufficiently large relative to $n$ and $f=\mathrm{ord}_p(2)$ (threshold $p>2^{2\mathcal B(l)+nl}$, $l=\frac{2(p-1)}{(3-(-1)^f)f}$); under ERH there are infinitely many such primes for fixed $n$. Moreover, the paper conducts GRH-based computations to establish nonexistence for relatively small $p$ by testing norm-form solvability via explicit class-group computations, providing concrete examples and an algorithmic framework for further search. The results advance understanding of GBFs by tying their existence to deep number-theoretic constraints in cyclotomic fields, with potential implications for cryptographic constructions relying on GBFs.

Abstract

We present a new result on the nonexistence of generalized bent functions (GBFs)from (Z/tZ)^n to Z/tZ (called type [n, t]) for a large class. Assume p is an odd prime number. By showing certain quadratic norm form equations having no integral points, we obtain a universalresult on the nonexistence of GBFs with type [n,2p^e] when p and n satisfy a certain inequality, and by computational methods with a widely accepted hypothesis, Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, we also achieve some results on the nonexistence of GBFs for relatively small p.

Nonexistence of generalized bent functions and the quadratic norm form equations

TL;DR

This work proves broad nonexistence results for generalized bent functions of type by translating the problem into the nonexistence of integral points on quadratic norm form equations over cyclotomic subfields. The authors establish a general criterion: if is a complex subfield of a cyclotomic field and , then for primes the norm equation has no solution in , with a descent mechanism to smaller fields underpinning the proof. Applying this to GBFs with yields a universal nonexistence when is sufficiently large relative to and (threshold , ); under ERH there are infinitely many such primes for fixed . Moreover, the paper conducts GRH-based computations to establish nonexistence for relatively small by testing norm-form solvability via explicit class-group computations, providing concrete examples and an algorithmic framework for further search. The results advance understanding of GBFs by tying their existence to deep number-theoretic constraints in cyclotomic fields, with potential implications for cryptographic constructions relying on GBFs.

Abstract

We present a new result on the nonexistence of generalized bent functions (GBFs)from (Z/tZ)^n to Z/tZ (called type [n, t]) for a large class. Assume p is an odd prime number. By showing certain quadratic norm form equations having no integral points, we obtain a universalresult on the nonexistence of GBFs with type [n,2p^e] when p and n satisfy a certain inequality, and by computational methods with a widely accepted hypothesis, Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, we also achieve some results on the nonexistence of GBFs for relatively small p.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 12 theorems, 59 equations, 1 table.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Let $p$ be an odd prime and $a$ be an integer with $f=\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}\nolimits_p(a)$. If then $\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}\nolimits_{p^e}(a)=fp^{e-1}$ for all $e>1$.

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3: murata1991problem
  • Definition 2.4: Self-conjugated Washington
  • Lemma 2.5: liu2016new
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • ...and 20 more