Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Complexity Growth Rate in Lovelock Gravity

Pablo A. Cano, Robie A. Hennigar, Hugo Marrochio

TL;DR

Using the complexity=action framework, the late time growth of complexity for charged black holes in Lovelock gravity is computed, finding in some cases a minimum mass below which complexity remains effectively constant, even if the black hole contains a nondegenerate horizon.

Abstract

Using the "Complexity = Action" framework we compute the late time growth of complexity for charged black holes in Lovelock gravity. Our calculation is facilitated by the fact that the null boundaries of the Wheeler-DeWitt patch do not contribute at late times and essential contributions coming from the joints are now understood arXiv:1803.00172. The late time growth rate reduces to a difference of internal energies associated with the inner and outer horizons, and in the limit where the mass is much larger than the charge, we reproduce the celebrated result of $2M/π$ with corrections proportional to the highest Lovelock coupling in even (boundary) dimensions. We find in some cases a minimum mass below which complexity remains effectively constant, even if the black hole contains a non-degenerate horizon.

Complexity Growth Rate in Lovelock Gravity

TL;DR

Using the complexity=action framework, the late time growth of complexity for charged black holes in Lovelock gravity is computed, finding in some cases a minimum mass below which complexity remains effectively constant, even if the black hole contains a nondegenerate horizon.

Abstract

Using the "Complexity = Action" framework we compute the late time growth of complexity for charged black holes in Lovelock gravity. Our calculation is facilitated by the fact that the null boundaries of the Wheeler-DeWitt patch do not contribute at late times and essential contributions coming from the joints are now understood arXiv:1803.00172. The late time growth rate reduces to a difference of internal energies associated with the inner and outer horizons, and in the limit where the mass is much larger than the charge, we reproduce the celebrated result of with corrections proportional to the highest Lovelock coupling in even (boundary) dimensions. We find in some cases a minimum mass below which complexity remains effectively constant, even if the black hole contains a non-degenerate horizon.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 1 section, 35 equations, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The causal structure for a charged AdS black hole, with outer and inner horizons. The blue shaded region denotes the WDW patch, anchored at the boundary times $t_L=t_R=t/2$. At late times, the null boundaries of the WDW patch approach the inner and outer horizons.