Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Factorization Theorem Relating Euclidean and Light-Cone Parton Distributions

Taku Izubuchi, Xiangdong Ji, Luchang Jin, Iain W. Stewart, Yong Zhao

Abstract

In a large-momentum nucleon state, the matrix element of a gauge-invariant Euclidean Wilson line operator accessible from lattice QCD can be related to the standard light-cone parton distribution function through the large-momentum effective theory (LaMET) expansion. This relation is given by a factorization theorem with a non-trivial matching coefficient. Using the operator product expansion we prove the large-momentum factorization of the quasi-parton distribution function in LaMET, and show that the more recently discussed Ioffe-time distribution approach also obeys an equivalent factorization theorem. Explicit results for the coefficients are obtained and compared at one-loop. Our proof clearly demonstrates that the matching coefficients in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme depend on the large partonic momentum rather than the nucleon momentum.

Factorization Theorem Relating Euclidean and Light-Cone Parton Distributions

Abstract

In a large-momentum nucleon state, the matrix element of a gauge-invariant Euclidean Wilson line operator accessible from lattice QCD can be related to the standard light-cone parton distribution function through the large-momentum effective theory (LaMET) expansion. This relation is given by a factorization theorem with a non-trivial matching coefficient. Using the operator product expansion we prove the large-momentum factorization of the quasi-parton distribution function in LaMET, and show that the more recently discussed Ioffe-time distribution approach also obeys an equivalent factorization theorem. Explicit results for the coefficients are obtained and compared at one-loop. Our proof clearly demonstrates that the matching coefficients in the scheme depend on the large partonic momentum rather than the nucleon momentum.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 103 equations, 4 figures, 1 table.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: One-loop Feynman diagrams for the quasi-PDF, spatial correlator and pseudo-PDFs. The first one is named "vertex", the second and third ones are named "sail", and the last one "tadpole". The standard quark self energy wavefunction is also included.
  • Figure 2: The $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme PDF $xf_{u-d}$ and the $\overline{\rm MS}$ quasi-PDF obtained from $x\, C^{\overline{\rm MS}}(p^z)\otimes f_{u-d}$, comparing results obtained with $p^z=yP^z$ and $p^z=P^z$.
  • Figure 3: (Left) Comparison between the PDF $xf_{u-d}$ and the pseudo-PDF $x({\cal C}^{\overline{\rm MS}}\otimes f_{u-d})$ in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme. The orange and blue bands indicate the results from varying the factorization scale $\mu=4\,{\rm GeV}$ by a factor of two. (Right) Same but now showing only central pseudo-PDF curves for different values of $z$.
  • Figure 4: (left) Comparison between the light-cone time distribution $Q_{u-d}$ and spatial correlator from $({\cal C}^{\overline{\rm MS}}\otimes Q_{u-d})$ in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme. The orange and blue bands indicate the results from varying the factorization scale $\mu=4\,{\rm GeV}$ by a factor of two. (right) Same but now showing only central spatial correlator curves for different values of $z$. The top panels show the real part, while bottom panels show the imaginary part.